- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
During the TV programme last night there was a perfect example of how UK disingenuously claims to have reduced CO2 levels by the amount claimed.To be precise, we are of-shoring our pollution production, but our consumption/use remains.
And of course crowing about how we have reduced our pollution emissions.
https://www.radiotimes.com/programme/b-qztojo/how-green-is-the-government-dispatches/episodes/
Bio-fuel used in power stations such as Drax, is often dirtier fuel than coal, but because it is imported, the pollution levels were already counted in its production, in the country of origin, not in its consumption in UK.
So power stations such as Drax are claimed by UK to be net zero polluters, when in reality they are sometimes dirtier than coal fired power stations.
Bio-fuel pollution is accounted for in the land use figures, in whichever country it is produced, therefore it is not accounted for in energy production figures.
If it were to be accounted for in energy production, as well, there would be a double counting.
Additionally, transport outside of a country's territory is also not included in that country's pollution accounting. So bio-fuel, is accounted for in the country of origin, and also not accounted for in any transportation figures involved in import to UK.