Climate: The Movie

[berty3000]

Irrelevant.

It isn't irrelevant. It is indicative of your integrity as a person.

If you're going to spout on about man made global warming, which you presumably care enough about to keep posting on here about it, why would you not adjust your habits to help address the problem? A problem you believe exists and which you believe that you are yourself contributing to?

The word hypocrit springs to mind...

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I have answered several times

No, you havent.

What does "by a tiny tiny amount" mean if you or anybody cant quantify it.

You are guilty of making wild claims and not backing them up, by swerving away and diverting.

Now, try and back up your comment. What does "by a tiny tiny amount" mean. Either it is measureable, or it isn't.

 

[noseall]

And what sacrifices are you making to reflect this?

Wasting bandwidth pointing out your failed crusade.
A noble sacrifice, I might add.

 

[berty3000]

No, you havent.

What does "by a tiny tiny amount" mean if you or anybody cant quantify it.

You are guilty of making wild claims and not backing them up, by swerving away and diverting.

Now, try and back up your comment. What does "by a tiny tiny amount" mean. Either it is measureable, or it isn't.

Can you please provide a link to the post where I wrote:

"by a tiny tiny amount"

?

Can you also provide a link to my wild claims?

All I have said is: it isn't possible to know, we should take some precautionary measures but not the excessive ones being proposed. That is moderate, not extreme.

 

[denso13]

It isn't irrelevant. It is indicative of your integrity as a person.

It is absolutely irrelevant as to whether man made climate change is a thing.

It's just another deflection tactic, a way for you to criticise and minimise the problem. "Well you don't live under a tree and eat grass so it must be fake" kinda thing.

 

[denso13]

All I have said is: it isn't possible to know, we should take some precautionary measures but not the excessive ones being proposed.

In your opinion. Are you a climate scientist?

 

[berty3000]

.

 

[Notch7]

You seem to have the memory span of a gold fish

Insults just show everybody the weakness of your argument

 

[Notch7]

Resorting to insults…..it’s like a beacon that says “My argument is very very weak”

 

[berty3000]

In your opinion. Are you a climate scientist?

It is common sense! Use your brain.

How could anybody know what the climate would be like if human society had never happened? Putting to one side that we wouldn't even exist to ask the question, how can we know what the difference would be?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Can you please provide a link to the post where I wrote:

"by a tiny tiny amount"

?

Can you also provide a link to my wild claims?

All I have said is: it isn't possible to know, we should take some precautionary measures but not the excessive ones being proposed. That is moderate, not extreme.

No. You posted it, you go look for it.

if you are trying to backtrack, I will keep reminding you about it.

Wild claims, pretty much everything you post. Disputing the evidence of scientists the world over. You have already agreed it sthe cost of action that you dont like, not the need for action or not.

The more you post, the more you contra what you have previously said.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

What was it you said about attacking the person and not the message?

Revealing your true self as you go on.

I have to admit I am curious who you work for, I think it is fossil fuel related

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It is common sense! Use your brain.

How could anybody know what the climate would be like if human society had never happened? Putting to one side that we wouldn't even exist to ask the question, how can we know what the difference would be?

Just by looking at history helps a lot

 

[berty3000]

It is absolutely irrelevant as to whether man made climate change is a thing.

It's just another deflection tactic, a way for you to criticise and minimise the problem. "Well you don't live under a tree and eat grass so it must be fake" kinda thing.

If you hold the view that man does contribute to climate change but don't care about the amount or doing anything about it, or care for any of the policy responses, then yes it is irrelevant. If you are in this camp, we probably have a reasonable amount in common.

However, anybody who subscribes to the emergency narrative and supports more and more punitive action on the citizenry of this country, is clearly a hypocrit if they are failing to make the personal sacrifices that would be congruent with their stated beliefs. Like my neighbour who says "we should all do our bit", as he stand in front of his two sports cars, SUV, boat, and all the other crap they keep buying.

 

[denso13]

Putting to one side that we wouldn't even exist to ask the question, how can we know what the difference would be?

There is a whole world of scientific research and modelling out there if you care to look. By your argument we can know nothing of the times before humans existed. That is just demonstrably wrong.