And still avoiding the very basic question.
Is mankind affecting climate change. He can't or won't answer. But I know why not
I have answered several times, including to you directly. You seem to have the memory span of a gold fish.
It is not possible to answer that question; nobody knows. It is impossible to know what the climate would look like without the existence of human society. We can guess and we can try to model it, but that is all.
When I previously pointed this out, you agreed that it is not possible to be certain and stated that science is never certain.
You then, over several posts, stated that something needs to be done, but didn't give any details, despite me asking. I also responded that to take action is based on the precautionary principle, i.e. taking action in relation to something that we are not sure about - as a precaution.
This then begs the question, what should be done as a precaution? The current approach by government is to claim that there is an emergency and that extreme and urgent action is needed (net zero). This is clearly questionable, and not being pursued by 80% of the world's governments, including China, which carry on developing fossil fuel capacity.
I have repeatedly asked you and other alarmists what you are all doing in your own lives, but none of you answer. Because you're not doing anything. This shows a distinct lack of integrity and hypocrisy.
Has this helped jog your memory?