i've seen quite a few ceilings brought down by leaking o rings on push fits
Could you be more specific about the number you've seen?
For example, is it 1-5? 6-20? 21-50? More?
And were they the same brand, or a variety of brands?
If the latter, did one brand account for most of the leaks, or was it seemingly random?
And what proportion of the installations used plastic pipe with the push-fit fittings, compared to those that used copper tube?
And of those that used copper, in how many cases was the tube in new and perfect condition, i.e. not dented, squashed, or deformed, and in how many cases were the push-fit fittings installed onto old copper pipework?
And of those that used plastic, did you examine the pipe and verify that it hadn't been scratched or scored?
The only ways that a push-fit fitting can leak, other than on the O ring, is by breaking/splitting or by the pipe pulling out of the grab ring. Are you saying that you've seen numerous fittings break/split? Or were the failures caused by the pipe pulling out?
If the latter, then did you examine the grab rings? If so, were they flawed? If so, were they went back to the manufacturer? If not, then why not?
And were the failures all the same brand, or a variety of brands?
If the latter, did one brand account for most of the leaks, or was it seemingly random?
that includes ones where the pipe ends were neatly cut and the fittings where perfectly fitted with inserts and collet clips.
You seem to be implying that some of the instances you've seen were correctly installed, but are you claiming that in all cases the pipework was clipped at the distances stipulated by the manufacturer, and that the correct provision was made for thermal expansion?
If so, can you indicate, roughly, the proportion of "quite a few ceilings" that were brought down by correctly installed push-fit fittings?
i've seen them fail within a year or two
Again, were they the same brand, or a variety of brands?
If the latter, did one brand account for most of the leaks, or was it seemingly random?
it's not that common but does happen.
If it's not that common, then it's reasonable to use the word "rare", or "unusual". Given that it's unusual, or even rare, for push-fit, what word would you use to describe how often, by comparison, you see problems with eroded, or corroded copper on soldered installations, leaking joints on badly installed compression fittings, and split pipes or olives pushed off by water freezing inside copper pipes?
as for longevity i guess we'll have to see if the epdm (i looked it up) seals last as long or longer than the estimated age of 30-50 years although i think that could well depend on if the pipes get disturbed.
Who made the estimation of 30-50 years?
before anyone goes complaining that it's nothing to do with it's construction i have to say the biggest problem with plastic pipe and push fits is they give diyers the idea that they can do jobs they couldn't have done with copper and they muck up it's installation time and time again because they think they know what they're up to when they've got no idea at all!
Time and time again? Really? Are you saying that the same novices repeatedly make the same mistake? Surely people who make a mistake are made wiser by the experience, and are unlikely to make the same mistake time and time again?
Is it more that case that "
time and time again" just a handy phrase to use, in order to create the impression of a wealth of examples of failures caused by novices?
The reality, i.e. not the 'wrong' impression that you imply, is that plastic pipe and push-fit fittings give diyers the
correct idea that they can do jobs they couldn't have done with copper. This is a fact, not a myth, or the mistake that you imply.
And if you're right, that novices make a great many mistakes, and make them "time and time again", (sic.), then those are ALL installation errors, not manufacturing or design faults.
for bad installations new houses are the perfect example
Perfect example of what? Clearly not of novices using the products wrongly, so do you mean that new build faults are the perfect example of installation errors?
half of new houses are water damage insurance claims waiting to happen, no inserts or clips, badly installed pipework, few pipe clips etc. this is my main reason for disliking push fits, 9 times out of 10 they're installed wrong!
If I chose a new build estate near where I live, I could easily argue that you're 100% wrong, since in a sample of around 50 properties, I can count at least 50 leaks that have arisen from shabbily made compression joints, over-rigid installation that doesn't allow for building movement, failure to flush systems resulting in copper corrosion
within four years, use of tap connectors with cheap fibre washers made from a material similar in strength and porosity to porridge, and misalignment of rigid copper pipework causing strain in, and failure of, plastic WC float valve shanks.
In all of those 50 properties,
not one single leak resulted from a failed plastic pipe, a push-fit fitting, or an O ring failure.
If you find any claim from me, on any post, on any topic, regarding the number of leaks on non plastic, and non push-fit, installations that I've seen, I can look through my records and tell you the precise number.
So, how have you collected your statistics?