No one knows, but the question remains.
No flu; lots of covid.
Is there any flu in India?
No flu; lots of covid.
Is there any flu in India?
they have worked well against covid, and the elderly who are vulnerable to flu were keeping themselves far safer during the second wave. What woulld your explanation be to very low numbers of people suffering from flu this past season ? the flu virus caught covid or decided it was out matched and didn't want to compete in 21.Why then did they not work as well against covid?
then you are not in a position to suggestNo one knows....
...they not work as well against covid...?
So do you also advocate this approach every year in order to avoid the tens of thousands of flu deaths in a 'normal' year?We've been on multiple lockdowns with mask wearing, social distancing and increased hygiene?
Have they?they have worked well against covid,
Yet they are the vast majority who died.and the elderly who are vulnerable to flu were keeping themselves far safer during the second wave.
I don't know. That's why I asked.What would your explanation be to very low numbers of people suffering from flu this past season ? the flu virus caught covid or decided it was out matched and didn't want to compete in 21.
You could draw that line in a number of places, but stopping one's health care system going into meltdown would be one good place. See India for details for why this would be a good idea. There other criteria you could use of course.So do you also advocate this approach every year in order to avoid the tens of thousands of flu deaths in a 'normal' year?
Or indeed have you questioned the lack of 'lockdowns' at all in the past?
What is your limit/milestone as regards to the numbers of deaths from any communicable disease before a 'lockdown' should be implemented?
So what are you going to say to the families of thousands of people who have or are going to die of treatable diseases because the NHS has drastically cut back on diagnosis/treatment?You could draw that line in a number of places, but stopping one's health care system going into meltdown would be one good place.
So what are you going to say to the families of thousands of people who have or are going to die of treatable diseases because the NHS has drastically cut back on diagnosis/treatment?
That they died for the 'greater good'?
As usual deflecting from the original question...What would you have done?
As usual deflecting from the original question...
You answer mine and I'll answer yours
what would the infection rate have been without them?
Lockdown far sooner, test & trace locally run when numbers are low enough, not underfunded NHS, support for those isolating, and when it gets low, aim for eradication.... I could go on, but the Tories have blood on their hands.So what are you going to say to the families of thousands of people who have or are going to die of treatable diseases because the NHS has drastically cut back on diagnosis/treatment?
That they died for the 'greater good'?
I'd have done similar to what has been done but with earlier and tighter lockdowns (bit of hindsight in there, granted)