Covid Death Stats: Looking Like Us Doubters May Be Right

So you think everybody should just die?

Blimey. I bet you're jolly at parties.
I can imagine Ihavenojob at a party:
"EXCUSE ME, EVERYONE, CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION.
THERE'S TOO MANY PEOPLE HERE NOW, SO IF SOME OF YOU DON'T START SHUFFLING OFF, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO COME ROUND AND START KILLING SOME OF YOU! THANK YOU. DRINKS ARE OVER THERE, SANDWICHES OVER HERE."
 
Sponsored Links
At the present time I haven't seen any long term test evidence on the effect of these 'jabs'...

There is plenty of short and longer term evidence of the effects of catching covid - have you considered that? The effects depend on the person throughout the age ranges getting high probabilities of serious effects as people get older but some had died in all age groups. There is less info about debilitation but it's a fact that it can be for the rest of peoples life and it may even turn out that some proportion don't live for as long as they might have done if they hadn't caught it.

Then comes the side effect of the jabs. Has it occurred to you that these are the result of some characteristic of the people that have had them? That's pretty typical of all medication.

Then comes the balance point. Risk from catching it and risk from having the jabs. Also which jab. One thing for sure is covid is not going away and it will take a few months to really see how the UK fairs. There are still loads of people that have never caught it. In the future some who have decided not to have the jab will catch it. I suspect these will hit the news.
 
Sponsored Links
RWR Mantra if you can't afford it, you can't have it.

Poor Bojo can't afford Carrie liberal elite tastes. I mean £800 on wallpaper - you really should be questioning Bojo judgement.

screenshot-2021-03-05-at-084806.jpg
 
... you can claim that 'Off Guardian' is one of your conspiracy mongers...

Thanks.

Your website is a nutjob conspiracist.

It has no connection to a respected newspaper of a similar name.
 
Thanks.

Your website is a nutjob conspiracist.

It has no connection to a respected newspaper of a similar name.

but you can't argue the qualifications of the many & relevant specialists the article refers to. Listen & read about what they're saying, consider the fact that your MSM has mostly blocked their messages.
 
In the future some who have decided not to have the jab will catch it. I suspect these will hit the news.
Which 'strain' of the 'virus' though?

In the future those who decided to have the 'jab(s)' may catch another 'version', so the saga may well continue...

It is not an impossibility that those who decide not to be 'jabbed' (with a 'vaccine' not of their choice ) may well have already caught the 'virus', and may well then have a better immune system reaction to future 'viruses'...

Of course we won't know that because there were no extensive tests on these 'vaccines' on the different 'strains' already known. They are now starting 'tests' on the use of multiple 'vaccines' to see what effect it has.
The human race is now undergoing the largest medical experiment in history!

So after thinking again, maybe borisconi with his alleged 'bodies' remark might have been right...

Cut out the 'dead wood' without harming the overall system? That's how nature usually works!
 
I'll just put this here . . . . https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/29/deleting-the-reset-the-imminent-struggle-ahead

You can claim that 'Off Guardian' is one of your conspiracy mongers, but you can't argue the qualifications of the many & relevant specialists the article refers to. Listen & read about what they're saying, consider the fact that your MSM has mostly blocked their messages.

Now I am getting worried . . . .
Interesting reading:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/offguardian/
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top