I hadn't forgotten that, but it seems that I misunderstood what was being suggested.
Perhaps we are talking at cross purposes. This thread started out on the mechanics of an Economy 7 meter used to charge an EV but, it seemed to me, has evolved into how the government will recoup the 'lost' revenue from electricity not have fuel duty, et al, applied to it.
You rightly pointed out that putting all the cost on a per-mileage charge means that there needs to 'free' charging at home with the associated complexities that involves. I was saying that there is no issue about paying for the mechanism by which the car is powered (fuel or electricity), the issue is with recouping the 'lost' tax revenue.
Hence, rather than applying the solution of per-mileage charging to both parts of the cost (which creates additional problems) I was saying that the solution would only be applied to the part of the cost where there is an issue.
Are you suggesting that the electricity used would simply be charged at the standard rate (hence no problems of metering)
No idea if it would be standard rate or Economy 7. I don't know enough about the level of detail to form an opinion.
However, I thought the concerns related to the electricity supply (not just the excise duty), with fears that 'Big Brother' and his friend the 'smart meter' would monitor and maybe 'control' home EV charging (and many other things) and maybe levy a different charge for electricity (not excise duty) used for EV charging.
That is a concern (or set of concerns) that I think has some validity but, as I said earlier, I thought recouping the lost tax revenue had come up as a concern as well.
Personally I am somewhat sceptical that the national roll-out of smart meters will take place. As well as all of the more detailed issues (e.g. incompatibility between companies), it is a massive way behind schedule and there are serious doubts that it costs in.
I heard an academic expert being interviewed about this. He said that the cost is supposed to be £11 billion to deliver a saving of £16 billion. However those figures are based on people reducing their usage c. 10% and were produced before there was any large-scale real-world evidence. We how have that evidence and it shows that people stop looking at the energy monitors after a few weeks and that reductions are no more than 3%.