I have three plug in meters, and I can monitor what any plug in item uses, I also have a couple of clamp on meters one hand held, the other the display can be monitored remote. However not sure they really help.
1) Light bulbs are marked with the wattage, so living room is 8 x 6 watt so 48 watt, so needs to run for 20 hours to use one unit the kWh. So simple to reduce usage can remove half the bulbs, but at 96p (working on 20p per kWh) is it really worth it?
2) Washing machine, tumble drier, now these are heavy power users, so wearing the same cloths two days on the run will cut costs, I tried to measure the cost of a wash, it was different every wash, the machine weighs the cloths, so even on the same cycle every time, each wash was different. We know by washing cooler or with less water we can reduce costs, and also not tumble drying, I tried not tumble drying, but by time I factored in how many time cloths were re-washed due to bird lime or other dirt, not sure it saves money putting cloths out on the line. Internet says cost to use per hour 30–75 p. As can be seen there can be a saving using the right machine. So random looked at Hotpoint NSWR 742U and it states "
Energy consumption per cycle 0.69 kWh" so 14p per wash, is it really worth worrying about?
3) Cooker, well here we can make a saving, the oven OK not much we can do there, but the hot plate idea is we want heat into the food not the kitchen, so the induction hob must help. But can't really use a 13 amp power meter, as hard wired, and we are looking at average, so to measure with main electricity meter every thing else needs turning off. But again per meal, hard to work out, clearly a meal using one ring cheaper than one using 4 rings or heat areas, but the rings be it halogen or induction switch on/off, so likely using a pressure cooker on an induction hob will reduce cost to using pans on a halogen hob, but still looking at pence saving.
4) Items on stand-by, be it TV or video recorder there is a 1 watt limit to most items, so 1000 hours costs 20p, there is an exception here however, satellite boxes can only monitor for program changes if the LNB is powered, so Sky box uses around 15 watt on stand-by, but even that is not much.
5) fridge/freezers, at last some thing worth monitoring, if the thermal insulation fails on a fridge/freezer it will use more power, also if it cools too much, I have a very small freezer bought for my mother, around 35 litre, the plug in energy monitor showed it was using around 75 watt when running, and 75 w/hour average. Clearly it was never turning off, this could be one of three, insulation failed, going to cold, loss of gas, so step one measure the temperature. Seemed easy until I tried to find a thermometer to measure -18°C, lucky I do home brew, and the thermostat used for home brew when that low, showed -24°C so new thermostat cured it. In the main fridge freezer uses 100 - 300 kWh/annum so less than £60 per year when running correctly, but one large one may use 1.5 times one half the size, so better with one big one than two small unless of course one fails. If not turning off, one can easy pay £500 per year instead of £60 per year, so well worth monitoring.
6) Immersion heater, this is an odd one out, 40 gallons takes a lot of cooling, so unless on a duel tariff, hardly worth switching off, what you want is loads of insulation around the tank. However I use a 1 kW under sink water heater, it stored 7 litres of water, and never seemed to run out, the insulation was very good, so likely saved energy.
However the big problem is to save electrical energy in the main means spending money, and if we are struggling to pay the electric bill, then too late, you no longer have the money to invest to reduce the bill.
I lived in a caravan for 3 years, with a 10 amp supply, all heating and cooking and rest all with 10 amp, to save money reduce rooms used to one. There is no magic cure, having unkempt hair and clapping hands to turn lights on/off only works with adverts, not in real life.