This probably comes under the heading Be Careful What You Wish For, but the news that the Saudi govt. are encouraging private company investors to consider buying Manchester United (or Liverpool) made me wonder how the Glazer protestors will feel if United take the petro-dollar to maintain their place at the top table of club football.
@TheGuardian.com
In hosting major sporting events including boxing world title fights Saudi has been accused of sportwashing to deflect criticism of its record on human rights. But Prince Abdulaziz claimed doing so has been positive for his nation’s people.
“The numbers don’t lie – when you look at participation in boxing, from six gyms in 2018 to 57 gyms today. A 300% participation increase, 60% are women, which was a shock for us. When you see appetite from the youth, men and women, they learned from it. If it’s making the country better and fixing a lot of the social issues we have in terms of participation then that’s a benefit for us,” he said.
And isn't that among the reasons why FIFA awarded the competition to Qatar - and South Africa; South Korea/Japan? To develop the game and bring investment into these regions in order to develop sporting links with the rest of the world.
It could be argued that it does work: South Korea and Japan have greatly improved during the past 20 years, although S.Africa hasn't because political corruption is much greater, perhaps, while S.K and Japan have a more stable government by comparison.
If the Western governments felt so strongly about Qatar's record on human rights then shouldn't similar sanctions be imposed, such as Iran and Russia currently face?