Poor Sooey goes around in circles repeating the same falsehoods.....I think he needs to write them down, it would save us having to correct him so often, its getting mildly tedious
EU and astra zeneca, still going on
- Thread starter sxturbo
- Start date
Poor Sooey goes around in circles repeating the same falsehoods.....I think he needs to write them down, it would save us having to correct him so often, its getting mildly tedious
Sponsored Links
Yes I'm sure Bobby will be on here fairly soon, praising the efforts of our government, over vaccine procurement.
Isn't it strange how different countries in the EU are trying to discredit the efficacy of a certain vaccine.
You would think they were trying to Weasel there way out of not looking after there own populations.
From a public health perspective, discrediting a vaccine (Macron) is quite damaging.
Poor notch, believes every lie that he is told by the media. Even when he knows that they are liars.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/
For thick arzed Denso I'm quoting a guardian article here because it is actually telling the truth for once, and it is hard to link to articles/videos here that are not on the mainstream because the stasi on here ban me every time I do that.
Note that in this article it states that any PCR test using greater than 35 cycles is meaningless.
The PCR testing that was done in this country all of last year was set to at least 40 cycles, may have been 45 can't remember.
The guy who invented the pcr test conveniently died late 2019
He won a nobel prize for it, but he said that it was not a diagnostic tool, and I believe that information is printed on the stuff that comes with the test kits.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/
For thick arzed Denso I'm quoting a guardian article here because it is actually telling the truth for once, and it is hard to link to articles/videos here that are not on the mainstream because the stasi on here ban me every time I do that.
Note that in this article it states that any PCR test using greater than 35 cycles is meaningless.
The PCR testing that was done in this country all of last year was set to at least 40 cycles, may have been 45 can't remember.
The guy who invented the pcr test conveniently died late 2019
He won a nobel prize for it, but he said that it was not a diagnostic tool, and I believe that information is printed on the stuff that comes with the test kits.
Last edited:
He'll just keep moving the goal posts every time he's proven wrong. As in Trump, the Dem's, the election etc. Sooey is a serial failure and his excuses are hilarious.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,760
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
Fair do's you got me on that one, the article is still telling the truth though.
I supppose that should have tipped me off that it wasn't the Guardian.
I supppose that should have tipped me off that it wasn't the Guardian.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,760
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
"Overall, we rate OffGuardian a Strong Conspiracy and Moderate Pseudoscience website that also promotes Russian propaganda"
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/offguardian/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/offguardian/
How about you actually read the article for once and look at what it says, instead of running to some hit piece to attack the messenger.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,760
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
I did and it was plainly obvious it was another crackpot site.
You must be used to it - serial loser.
Excert from article linked to at bottom:
Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/
Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/
Sponsored Links
