Farage

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you suggesting they should be sent to Siberia?
They? You mean send forrige to the gulag for his crimes against the UK?

A bit harsh. I think he should live in comfort, at one his buddies, on the outskirts of Moscow.
 
Sponsored Links
It's a great argument, but it has no basis in law. Funnily enough its a bit of EU law that rolled down, which gives him the most protection.

There are at least 3 areas of law that the bank has to answer for.

Data protection act 2018

- Banks cannot disclose confidential information or break data protection law to suit their PR agenda.

The Payment Accounts Regulations 2015
- Banks cannot set their own rules as they like or in secret
- banks cannot discriminate on political grounds

plus various laws regarding unfair terms
- Banks cannot have secret rules and processes - this would be an unfair term, even if it was published in their terms

Thats without looking at the defamation argument from the dodgy report.

They have a clear lack of knowledge regarding data protection law as they almost certainly didn't realise NF had the right to see the dodgy report
.
There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.

The brexhit voting public who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing to worry about, the wealthy pootin apologists probably don't either, frankly it’s just about one individual who craves the oxygen of self publicity.

Blup
 
They? You mean send forrige to the gulag for his crimes against the UK?

A bit harsh. I think he should live in comfort, at one his buddies, on the outskirts of Moscow.
Somewhere around Gorky Park, then?
He mustn't leave his cake out in the rain, in that case.
 
Sponsored Links
That would be remainers who want to cede governance to a foreign power then.
The EU weren't demanding the UK dethrone the Monarchy, were they?
Still a sovereign nation within the EU as far as i could tell.
 
There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.

The brexhit voting public who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing to worry about, the wealthy pootin apologists probably don't either, frankly it’s just about one individual who craves the oxygen of self publicity.

Blup
But you know this is nonsense. There is no basis for a public interest breach. "Defending" your reputation at best and badly exploiting a misunderstood PR opportunity are nowhere near sufficient. Telling the press he was booted on wealth grounds which we now know was a fib, is a clear breach of so many laws.
Why do you think they got rid of forrige?
The powers that be in the bank don't like him or his politics and this was there entire reason for setting him on a glide path out. Something they didn't disclose to him prior to the SAR. Which also breaks banking laws.
 
There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.

The brexhit voting public who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing to worry about, the wealthy pootin apologists probably don't either, frankly it’s just about one individual who craves the oxygen of self publicity.

Blup
Click to expand...
But you know this is nonsense. There is no basis for a public interest breach. "Defending" your reputation at best and badly exploiting a misunderstood PR opportunity are nowhere near sufficient. Telling the press he was booted on wealth grounds which we now know was a fib, is a clear breach of so many laws.”

He was kept on until his mortgage was paid off, ironically his debt kept him a customer but his wealth was not enough too.

Blup
 
Makes sense I guess. Do you think they still would have got rid of him if he'd met their wealth standards?
I bet they have lots of customers that they are not really comfortable with.

But with enough finances to accept as a customer in that division of the bank, and not the poor peoples bank, natwest.

Mbk keeps arguing about his account being closed, but glosses over he can still bank with the same group. Just on ordinary terms, not special high finance terms.

Farage does know how to keep his supporters behind him.
 
This is the extract I was referring to:

"Earlier this month, Keith Brown, a 43-year-old youth worker from the West Midlands, was jailed for four years after customs officials who stopped him on his way through Dubai airport found a speck of cannabis weighing 0.003g – invisible to the naked eye and lighter than a grain of sugar – on the bottom of his shoe."

Blup
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top