They? You mean send forrige to the gulag for his crimes against the UK?Are you suggesting they should be sent to Siberia?
A bit harsh. I think he should live in comfort, at one his buddies, on the outskirts of Moscow.
They? You mean send forrige to the gulag for his crimes against the UK?Are you suggesting they should be sent to Siberia?
There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.It's a great argument, but it has no basis in law. Funnily enough its a bit of EU law that rolled down, which gives him the most protection.
There are at least 3 areas of law that the bank has to answer for.
Data protection act 2018
Data Protection Act 2018
www.legislation.gov.uk
- Banks cannot disclose confidential information or break data protection law to suit their PR agenda.
The Payment Accounts Regulations 2015
- Banks cannot set their own rules as they like or in secretData Protection Act 2018
www.legislation.gov.uk
- banks cannot discriminate on political grounds
plus various laws regarding unfair terms
- Banks cannot have secret rules and processes - this would be an unfair term, even if it was published in their terms
Thats without looking at the defamation argument from the dodgy report.
They have a clear lack of knowledge regarding data protection law as they almost certainly didn't realise NF had the right to see the dodgy report
.
Why do you think they got rid of forrige?So you don't think the comments in the report are deeply inappropriate? and you don't think claiming he was de-banked on wealth grounds not political grounds was untrue?
Somewhere around Gorky Park, then?They? You mean send forrige to the gulag for his crimes against the UK?
A bit harsh. I think he should live in comfort, at one his buddies, on the outskirts of Moscow.
The EU weren't demanding the UK dethrone the Monarchy, were they?That would be remainers who want to cede governance to a foreign power then.
But you know this is nonsense. There is no basis for a public interest breach. "Defending" your reputation at best and badly exploiting a misunderstood PR opportunity are nowhere near sufficient. Telling the press he was booted on wealth grounds which we now know was a fib, is a clear breach of so many laws.There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.
The brexhit voting public who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing to worry about, the wealthy pootin apologists probably don't either, frankly it’s just about one individual who craves the oxygen of self publicity.
Blup
The powers that be in the bank don't like him or his politics and this was there entire reason for setting him on a glide path out. Something they didn't disclose to him prior to the SAR. Which also breaks banking laws.Why do you think they got rid of forrige?
if it wasn't for the fact its 40 pages long, I'd say our Noseall had been moonlighting.
Just in case I'll check the report for the use of the work 'boyo'.
Winnie?Or "Brexit pile of pooh".
Makes sense I guess. Do you think they still would have got rid of him if he'd met their wealth standards?The powers that be in the bank don't like him
But you know this is nonsense. There is no basis for a public interest breach. "Defending" your reputation at best and badly exploiting a misunderstood PR opportunity are nowhere near sufficient. Telling the press he was booted on wealth grounds which we now know was a fib, is a clear breach of so many laws.”There is a delicious irony that EU human rights law protects him, but briefing journalists on matters of legitimate public interest is acceptable because the beeb quote was only used after far- rage went public and doubled down by making the full report available. At most Couts did 30.00001 mph in a 30 limit.
The brexhit voting public who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing to worry about, the wealthy pootin apologists probably don't either, frankly it’s just about one individual who craves the oxygen of self publicity.
Blup
Click to expand...
I bet they have lots of customers that they are not really comfortable with.Makes sense I guess. Do you think they still would have got rid of him if he'd met their wealth standards?