Farage

[motorbiking]

If I can follow your logic for a moment you are saying its ok, because...

NF went public saying he'd been de-banked/cancelled on political grounds.
Coutts briefed the press confidentially/anonymously that it was on commercial grounds - too poor
NF was upset and humiliated so issued a subject access request.
The request showed he met the commercial criteria but outlined a so called glide plan to exit him. e.g. not renewing his mortgage which would fix the commercial criteria.

On that basis you say, no data breach because NF broke the story first.
No payment account regulation breach because they had him on wealth grounds.
No defamation, because he published the report.

is that the summary?

 

[Brigadier]

it's a slippery slope (sans skis.) to start debanking, sacking or otherwise changing policy towards someone in the workplace or wider society on the basis of their political/religious views

No, it's not.
Companies have expectations of standards of behaviour from their employees.
For the good of all of their employees.

He also has shown a complete lack of empathy for decent societal norms, with his (****ter?) posting ;

"Taking to social media, Mr Farage added: "I thought the purpose of companies was to return dividends to their shareholders, and in this case that's you and me… we are the shareholders.

"But they're more bothered about putting up rainbow flags and being popular at dinner parties in Chelsea than they are about actually making money."


Simply, he is on record that he puts money above people.

Regardless of your political views, he's a c++t for that alone.

 

[noseall]

No defamation, because he published the report.

No.

No defamation because what Coutts put in the report is accurate. Forrige will not sue because even more reprehensible things will be outed from the traitorous scum.

 

[noseall]

Regardless of your political views, he's a c++t for that alone.

Correct.
UK hating, traitorous Russian sympathising scum.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

If I can follow your logic for a moment you are saying its ok, because...

NF went public saying he'd been de-banked/cancelled on political grounds.
Coutts briefed the press confidentially/anonymously that it was on commercial grounds - too poor
NF was upset and humiliated so issued a subject access request.
The request showed he met the commercial criteria but outlined a so called glide plan to exit him. e.g. not renewing his mortgage which would fix the commercial criteria.

On that basis you say, no data breach because NF broke the story first.
No payment account regulation breach because they had him on wealth grounds.
No defamation, because he published the report.

is that the summary?

He will sue if he has enough grounds.

Let's see.

What he is very good at is keeping his supporters following, even if what he says isn't factual. Dog whistling.

 

[Odds]

No, it's not.
Companies have expectations of standards of behaviour from their employees.
For the good of all of their employees.

He also has shown a complete lack of empathy for decent societal norms, with his (****ter?) posting ;

"Taking to social media, Mr Farage added: "I thought the purpose of companies was to return dividends to their shareholders, and in this case that's you and me… we are the shareholders.

"But they're more bothered about putting up rainbow flags and being popular at dinner parties in Chelsea than they are about actually making money."


Simply, he is on record that he puts money above people.

Regardless of your political views, he's a c++t for that alone.

Well, he's not an employee for a start and the allegations of Russian collusion are unproven. He may have talked to them regarding business deals but so did alot of Tories around that time; including George Osbourne and David Cameron...and Boris de Piffle.

 

[motorbiking]

No.

No defamation because what Coutts put in the report is accurate. Forrige will not sue because even more reprehensible things will be outed from the traitorous scum.

So you don't think the comments in the report are deeply inappropriate? and you don't think claiming he was de-banked on wealth grounds not political grounds was untrue?

it would be strange to send a letter of apology for a deeply inappropriate report, if you stood by it. don't you think?

 

[Brigadier]

Well, he's not an employee for a start and the allegations of Russian collusion are unproven. He may have talked to them regarding business deals but so did alot of Tories around that time; including George Osbourne and David Cameron...and Boris de Piffle.

I was replying to your post where you specifically used the term "sacking", and phrase "in the workplace".

I didn't mention Russia (and neither did you, in the post I was replying to).

 

[gant]

Read more

Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel to make sh*t stick, even old enoch gets a run out.
The ramifications are there for all to see but how many will see them.

 

[noseall]

So you don't think the comments in the report are deeply inappropriate?

Very. I nearly spat my teeth out at just how candid and blunt they were.

and you don't think claiming he was de-banked on wealth grounds not political grounds was untrue?

A bit of both, with a smattering of other more sinister stuff thrown in.

it would be strange to send a letter of apology for a deeply inappropriate report, if you stood by it. don't you think?

The Natwest CEO apologised for the language used (and forrige published). That was correct. The rest is still out there. The BBC have not apologised as the facts stand. There was an apology from a reporter who apologised for jumping the gun. Again, his facts still stand. No retractions.

 

[noseall]

The ramifications

Deport forrige to his backers in Russia and the UK can live happily ever after?

Getting rid of traitors - one Brexer at a time.

 

[motorbiking]

Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel to make sh*t stick, even old enoch gets a run out.
The ramifications are there for all to see but how many will see them.

if it wasn't for the fact its 40 pages long, I'd say our Noseall had been moonlighting.

 

[Odds]

Deport forrige to his backers in Russia and the UK can live happily ever after?

Getting rid of traitors - one Brexer at a time.

Are you suggesting they should be sent to Siberia?

 

[noseall]

So you don't think the comments in the report are deeply inappropriate? and you don't think claiming he was de-banked on wealth grounds not political grounds was untrue?

it would be strange to send a letter of apology for a deeply inappropriate report, if you stood by it. don't you think?

Why do you think Coutts got rid of fine upstanding British citizen, forrige?

 

[gant]

Getting rid of traitors

That would be remainers who want to cede governance to a foreign power then.