And he’ll get them.
And he’ll get them.
Interesting. Got anything to back any of that claptrap up with ?
Brexit is sorted, I don't hate anybody, but still waiting for the benefits.
Perhaps the Nat west should sue farageIf his case is so simple, and with the connections he has, he shouldn't even hesitate. Unless of course.....
Partly right, the important bit wrong though. Not Into this hate that you mention.Perhaps the Nat west should sue farage
They won’t
We have confidence in the lady they said
Well she resigned / was forced out with in hours
For telling porkie pies
Doubt she will be the only one ?
Farage has uncovered a can of worms in the Nat west
Perhaps high profile customers will not want to be associated with
Them and bank else where ???
You hate any one who supported brexit
I hear Coutts have a spare slot.Perhaps high profile customers will not want to be associated with
Them and bank else where ???
The important bit is no bank wants to be associated with Trump horn-smoking Brexers. Can't blame them either.Partly right, the important bit wrong though.
Perhaps high profile customers will not want to be associated with
Them and bank else where ???
would you like me to find it for you?
NF has a claim
Read the thread. I’ve posted it several times
A glide plan is a term from aviation that describes the gradual loss of altitude as you come in to land. It is also used in commercial/strategy/career etc
A gradual decline until you are out.
I'm not, it was engineered. https://www.coutts.com/become-a-client/private-form.html#:~:text=Eligibility questions&text=To open an account all,on your country of residence.
Not true - but we aren't talking about the equalities act here. Its the Payment Account Regulations Act.
Coutts would be nuts to test his claim.
the beeb disagrees with you as do most of the press.
They engineered the commercial glide plan. Obvious only a court can decide if it’s defamatory, but it certainly meets the test. Some of the claims are also higher level defamation, where the burden of disproof switches to the defendant.
It's as though he doesn't know himself.Not here.
Not here.
Not here.
Not here.
Not here.
Not here.
Is it like your imaginary press release, which you kept going on about, but which in fact didn't exist?