Farage

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Coutts would be nuts to test his claim. This will all be sorted behind closed doors. A private deal for a private bank, how very Coutts & Co.


somebody in their team was, otherwise why waste time compiling a 40 page dossier (and that is just the suff that had to shared due to the SAR).




RBS inc Natwest are listed, C&C is basically just a brand.

The "be gone by date x" letter that NF refers to is probably problematic too, but I haven't seen the text.
 
You left out this part:

Non-discrimination in the provision of payment accounts

18.—(1) A credit institution must not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the [F1United Kingdom by reason of their nationality or place of residence or by reason of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation] when those consumers apply for or access a payment account.

(2) The conditions applicable to holding a payment account with basic features must not be discriminatory.


And if you go through the other post nos you'll find an extensive list of likely breaches.
Try not to redact them too much if you reproduce them.
 
You left out this part:

Non-discrimination in the provision of payment accounts

18.—(1) A credit institution must not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the [F1United Kingdom by reason of their nationality or place of residence or by reason of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation] when those consumers apply for or access a payment account.

(2) The conditions applicable to holding a payment account with basic features must not be discriminatory.


And if you go through the other post nos you'll find an extensive list of likely breaches.
Try not to redact them too much if you reproduce them.
But they allowed to decide he is a PEP. And they did.
 
You left out this part:

Non-discrimination in the provision of payment accounts

18.—(1) A credit institution must not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the [F1United Kingdom by reason of their nationality or place of residence or by reason of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation] when those consumers apply for or access a payment account.

(2) The conditions applicable to holding a payment account with basic features must not be discriminatory.


And if you go through the other post nos you'll find an extensive list of likely breaches.
Try not to redact them too much if you reproduce them.
Does any of that mention him not meeting the financial terms?

Or are you looking at just 1 part of the problem.

It will all need to be taken into account for any claim. Let's hope he sues
 
How convenient this nothing story is pushed for days when the real story UK debt interest payments now account for over 10% of the Government Revenue.

You can fool some of the people all of the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top