@motorbiking I suspect a certain poster will only be happy when his bottom is wiped for him.
Should be simple to produceTell me what you think are his grounds for a claim and stop being silly.
I started clicking your links and found that they do not do that.
Should be simple to produce
I think that's already been coveredIt was, see posts 248, 321, 323, 363, 392, 413 and 459.
Yes. Been coveredTell me what you think are his grounds for a claim and stop being silly.
I started clicking your links and found that they do not do that.
Yes. Been covered
Coutts would be nuts to test his claim. This will all be sorted behind closed doors. A private deal for a private bank, how very Coutts & Co.
somebody in their team was, otherwise why waste time compiling a 40 page dossier (and that is just the suff that had to shared due to the SAR).
RBS inc Natwest are listed, C&C is basically just a brand.
The "be gone by date x" letter that NF refers to is probably problematic too, but I haven't seen the text.
But they allowed to decide he is a PEP. And they did.You left out this part:
Non-discrimination in the provision of payment accounts
18.—(1) A credit institution must not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the [F1United Kingdom by reason of their nationality or place of residence or by reason of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation] when those consumers apply for or access a payment account.
(2) The conditions applicable to holding a payment account with basic features must not be discriminatory.
And if you go through the other post nos you'll find an extensive list of likely breaches.
Try not to redact them too much if you reproduce them.
But they allowed to decide he is a PEP. And they did.
Does any of that mention him not meeting the financial terms?You left out this part:
Non-discrimination in the provision of payment accounts
18.—(1) A credit institution must not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the [F1United Kingdom by reason of their nationality or place of residence or by reason of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation] when those consumers apply for or access a payment account.
(2) The conditions applicable to holding a payment account with basic features must not be discriminatory.
And if you go through the other post nos you'll find an extensive list of likely breaches.
Try not to redact them too much if you reproduce them.