There's some story about Brexers trying to smear her because she investigated deceitful, lying, dishonest ex-Prime Minister Johnson, and showed him to be deceitful, lying and dishonest.
She broke a rule in the Civil Service Code. That's the rule book for all civil serpents, from the very lowest to the Cab Sec. Move along, nothing more to see. Won't affect her new job, unless Starmer says so.Still can’t but what’s all this in the news about her thus morning? Something about not declaring she was in talks about a job with Labour?
Sue's indiscretion is not quite that serious.BUT SHE LEFT THE LID OFF THE COFFEE JAR, FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wrong, wrong, and wrong again.I would have thought that her role as judge, jury and executioner
Boris was fooked no matter who looked at the evidence. Even ReeSmogg would have struggled to exonerate the lying idiot.I would have thought that her role as judge, jury and executioner of Boris would have made it extremely unwise of her to ignore the rules that apply to her.
If it didn't matter then why is she so keen to point out that they only chatted once?
I thought she was part of a team that found notorious liar, cheat and dishonest Boris, to have lied to Parliament?I would have thought that her role as judge, jury and executioner of Boris
She was at best an investigating judge, parliament was the ultimate jury (Borris’s 2019 majority), as for the executioner borris put his own head on the block by resigning.I would have thought that her role as judge, jury and executioner of Boris would have made it extremely unwise of her to ignore the rules that apply to her.
Or is she of the "Do what I say not what I do" mindset?
Should fit in well in Tony Blair II's mob though.