He’s right though, that picture was in poor taste.Same back at ya. You might think you are the forum judge and jury, but you aren't.
And I did report it.
He’s right though, that picture was in poor taste.Same back at ya. You might think you are the forum judge and jury, but you aren't.
No, he's wide of the mark as usual.He’s right though
That’s your opinion, it’s not a fact because you claim it is.No, he's wide of the mark as usual.
Of course it is, our opinions differ. So what?That’s your opinion
yes it is defined..........and that picture was not racial hatredYou understand it's not about what you think is racial hatred? It is defined.
there is no need to apologise when having done nothing wrongI think it's clear that having regard to all the circumstances you didn't care. But importantly when pointed out that hatred could be stirred you didn't retract your statement or apologise. You doubled down "truth hurts" etc. and its not the first time.
Correct.You understand that criticism of Israeli citizens is not the same as criticism of Isreal.
NothingOf course it is, our opinions differ. So what?
they will all be on the take, no moral compass, just who pays them enoughThe Hezbollah fruit cakes entire organisation (?) has been infiltrated by Mossad
Is that the same ISIS that USA supported in Syria?lets just consider this again
There’s no equivalence between Starmer and Johnsonthey will all be on the take, no moral compass, just who pays them enough
a bit like British PM's of late - Boris now Starmer
Is that the same ISIS that USA supported in Syria?
Rather makes your point looks stupid