Unless they want to access healthcare and find that there are more doctors and nurses working past early retirement age because they no longer have a punative tax bill that they can't opt out of without retiring early.
Some sort of tax avoidance plan for rich doctors? Is their hard work and contribution to society somehow worth more than someone who has built a business employing 100s of people, or defended the innocent from jail? Surely if you are a high earner and pay all your taxes, you should be able to benefit from the same tax policy as the next man?It would doubtless have been possible to alter the terms of the NHS pension scheme to prevent prosperous Consultants being accidentally dragged over the Lifetime Allowance.
But that would not have given the Tories the pleasure of giving extra benefit to all highly paid people, while using the NHS as a smokescreen.
Is Lower's suggestion that aged nurses already have pension plans worth well over a £million convincing?
I agree. For those that struggle or can't afford to put any money away for pension, it just means more help from the state later in life.I don't see the point in helping those who are already pension rich. Its the poorer people with small or no pensions that need the help
An increased personal tax allowance would allow more lower earners to actually see more money, and therefore make work pay
I don't see the point in helping those who are already pension rich. Its the poorer people with small or no pensions that need the help
Couldn't they have just ring fenced the changes to the NHS to help where there are shortages of doctors after a certain age?
Blup
Do many people in UK start on £50k? Are pensions growing at 8%? I'm defaulting to 'No', but happy to be proven wrong.Someone on 50k with an employer matching contributions, getting 5% pay rise each year and 8% pension growth would exceed the old cap.
This generous change only enriches the top 2% of UK earners.Do many people in UK start on £50k? Are pensions growing at 8%? I'm defaulting to 'No', but happy to be proven wrong.
Consultants' gripe is that they are getting big tax bills in service, not when they take the pot. I'm not even sure they can take the pot? I am pretty sure they can opt out for the last few years though, keep the contributions (taxed obvs) and have a slightly smaller pension.You do both understand that tax is paid when the pot is converted to an income?
It's good if people are encouraged to save for the future but the timing of this is absolutely untish.
Tories do though and always will.I don't see the point in helping those who are already pension rich. Its the poorer people with small or no pensions that need the help
What 5% every year for 30 years.....and 8 % pension growth...where exactly in narnia do you live and you would have to start on 50k at day 1....Someone on 50k with an employer matching contributions, getting 5% pay rise each year and 8% pension growth would exceed the old cap.