Perhaps if people were made aware they could vote in a government that would care.Then why does John go on&on&on&on&on about this issue, they've not broken the law, so what?
Perhaps if people were made aware they could vote in a government that would care.Then why does John go on&on&on&on&on about this issue, they've not broken the law, so what?
It's a global issue, don't have much say in America or Luxembourg.Perhaps if people were made aware they could vote in a government that would care.
So oh wise one, what DO WE DO?some, like that one, don't care enough.
I say again, tell the Hmrc, and post their reply.
Sad indictment on Britain today - law only applies to the law-abiding.
In other words, play by the rules, and you'll get bugger all.
Don't give a toss, and you're above the law.
So oh wise one, what DO WE DO?
So oh wise one, what DO WE DO?
So oh wise one, what DO WE DO?
But they're not making much of a profit (if they were, they'd be paying more tax).
Once again, comprehension is not your strong point.Defender of the law but only in select cases?
Were they the only ones? No, 110 voted against, I counted 24 Tory,ukip & dup so plenty more from elsewhere. Why do you have to post such misleading statements ?
Oh yes - and ignore people who try to mislead you with false stories
Is Brig still attempting to avoid the fact that the source of the problem is laws which have been written to facilitate international tax-dodging?