Stoday said:The numbers Big_Spark gives to justify his absurd figure for the cost per street light of £5728 per light per year are ludicrous.
"some are Photo-cell operated, and some are timeclock operated and some are both"
So someone's paying an extra £400+ a year for a timeswitch as well as a photocell to save - what? There's no energy saving because the kWh are not measured but assessed per kW of lamp (and control gear) load.
Post and lantern cost over £3600 a year. Observation in my neighbourhood suggests that changing once every five years must be very excessive. But that would put the cost of a street light at £18,000. That's crazy.
For the most part, lighting that gets damaged in accidents gets paid for by car insurance companies.
So we are left with the situation whereby either the councils don't know how to do their sums or Big_Spark has got it wrong.
Form on other threads of this forum suggest the latter.
empip said:
Surely this couldn't achieve much? go to
//www.diynot.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=39439&start=24
To see more...
oilman said:WTF has this got to do with the topic???????
empip said:"Coun Ron Mein said he had been given disturbing information from a local teacher that youngsters were using...."
I would hope he'd go along and observe for himself ... Should have thought the self illuminators would be useful for showing the road direction .. but perhaps that was a different stretch without the solars.
david and julie said:.........................
Gripe over.
oilman said:david and julie said:.........................
Gripe over.
Thank goodness for that.
oilman said:david and julie said:.........................
Gripe over.
Thank goodness for that.
david and julie said:oilman said:david and julie said:.........................
Gripe over.
Thank goodness for that.
Keep your trap shut ar**sole your halitosis is making my eyes water.
My post was on topic and inoffensive, yours was again an off topic load of claptrap.