Big_Spark said:I cannot remember which country it was in..perhaps one of the equally travelled members can fill this in and remind me of the location...
Vladivostok mate. What were you doing there?
Big_Spark said:I cannot remember which country it was in..perhaps one of the equally travelled members can fill this in and remind me of the location...
david and julie said:Oilman, I prefer a challenge to the challenged. The posts are there for all to see, you were the offensive one, not me. I only replied to your post in the same manner as you.david and julie said:Really? So do you get thumped often in pubs for coming out with a statement likeKeep your trap shut ar**sole your halitosis is making my eyes water.
My post was on topic and inoffensive, yours was again an off topic load of claptrap.
I would be quite comfortable in not getting thumped for
Thank goodness for that.
Or did you have a more obtuse meaning? I can't see quite why you need to be so constantly rude, unless of course you se me as some sort of threat to some perceived position you have.
oilman said:david and julie said:Oilman, I prefer a challenge to the challenged. The posts are there for all to see, you were the offensive one, not me. I only replied to your post in the same manner as you.david and julie said:Really? So do you get thumped often in pubs for coming out with a statement likeKeep your trap shut ar**sole your halitosis is making my eyes water.
My post was on topic and inoffensive, yours was again an off topic load of claptrap.
I would be quite comfortable in not getting thumped for
Thank goodness for that.
Or did you have a more obtuse meaning? I can't see quite why you need to be so constantly rude, unless of course you se me as some sort of threat to some perceived position you have.
actually if I said something and someone said "thank goodness for that" id be breaking the bottle over their head before they closed their mouths for a sarky reply like that. if i was standing there in a group and someone said it to someone else id see nothing wrong if they did get a mouth full of fist
as for the d+j reply, if someone said that to me id probably find it hard not to laugh, if i herd it said to someone then id probably be pointing and laughing
there is a difference between a sarky reply from someone who has nothing better to add and nothing more insulting and rude, whereas theres a hell of a lot of amusement in a humorous reply.
dont get me wrong im not taking sides, just my opinion
..............actually if I said something and someone said "thank goodness for that" id be breaking the bottle over their head before they closed their mouths for a sarky reply like that.
david and julie said:Oilman, I prefer a challenge to the challenged. The posts are there for all to see, you were the offensive one, not me. I only replied to your post in the same manner as you.
Gripe over
Thank goodness for that
oilman said:..............actually if I said something and someone said "thank goodness for that" id be breaking the bottle over their head before they closed their mouths for a sarky reply like that.
Same moronic blokish mentality then, easily offended by something you just might have misinterpreted, but then I doubt you could have thought of that.
Have I missed something?And then Freddie said
Same moronic blokish mentality then, easily offended by something you just might have misinterpreted, but then I doubt you could have thought of that.
Big_Spark said:
Big_Spark said:Actually Julie, Freddie didn't even say what I said he did..it was Oilman...
And YOU didn't even spot it.
Nothing Oilman said warranted the attack he recieved, Dave accused him of insulting him but he did not..
I am aware people know that Oilman , Freddie and I do not always see eye to eye, but if your going to start an argument, do it with some ammunition, not a blank..
Big_Spark said:Julie..read your post quickly, spotted my error and made my post..and then promptly misinterpreted what you meant..
This is very confusing - why are you using the term "factored in" when you appear simply to be "adding" numbers to the cost, for no good reason?Big_Spark said:Okay, I have dug out the files from my filing cabinet and had a quick squint through them...
.
.
.
Cost = £274.89
Now factored into this cost is 18% for Illuminated Road Signage = £49.48
Also a further 23% is factored in for Traffic Control Systems = £63.22
Total Cost of electricity per Lamp = £387.59
You've included an annual cost of replacing the post - this is ludicrous. What is the average age of a post?Big_Spark said:Further Costs making up the total figure of £5728.61 are...
<snip>
Grand Total of £5728.61
No they're not. They're figures being posted by you without any credence to them whatsoever. This is an all to familiar scenario. Next you'll be claiming that the post outside your house is metal-bodied, and all others are plastic bodied.Big_Spark said:The figures are all average costs across the entire country.
This is blatenty untrue. Post replacement, for example, isn't caused by the electricity wearing out the post. In fact, arguably, the post would be more at risk from vehicle damage if its overhead light were turned off!Big_Spark said:The point is that if the lights were turned off, then Nationally a LOT of money could be diverted elswhere as there would be no maintenance costs nor running costs.