Has the war in Ukraine changed your stance on Brexit?

[Mottie]

Putin has 6000 nukes, some of which would flatten everything from Oxford Street to the M25.
We have 225 nukes.

Who has the deterrent?

You can only blow things up once. Our 225 plus NATO's 7,000+ nukes should be more than enough.

 

[Notch7]

You did indeed and that is how most will take your OP.

In my judgement we, England is better off outside the EU. As just like reaching a decision on vaccines was done while the clowns in the EU argued over pricing/safety/etc our gov went ahead and took the risk with our the taxpayer's money. Re the invasion, we are better off out as that lot are looking towards us in England re their security. England has a history of ****-stirring etc, EG Iraq/WMD, Libya "we will be welcomed" with open arms and then we have Ireland.



So we are better off out and decide for ourselves what we do or not.

Btw, we'd be better off outside NATO as whe have the sea around GB and have nukes so just like Putin even when our gov is **** stirring, just remind them of the nukes.

So you voted for Putins Brexit.

 

[Notch7]

Were you pro or against Brexit originally and has the war made you, like me, think closer integration with Europe is all the more important in the world we're entering into.

It's Russia at the moment but we all know that at some point it will be China too some day.

Or do you feel that the UK is better positioned to deal with events like this as an independent entity, and why?

Brexit was pushed by Putin as he wanted it to destabalise the EU.

 

[Notch7]

You can only blow things up once. Our 225 plus NATO's 7,000+ nukes should be more than enough.

the problem is Putins threat of nuclear war has scared us off doing anything to help Ukraine.

 

[The Samaritan]

What the armchair strategist hear miserably fail to acknowledge/understand is the nukes kilotonage, fact

North Korea many only have a handful of nukes but their capacity is massive I have been advised by an unnamed source who is in the know about items of this nature.

Th

 

[Notch7]

Interesting that none of the Russians which this government has sanctioned were Tory donors

 

[The Samaritan]

Interesting that none of the Russians which this government has sanctioned were Tory donors

Are you insinuating that all "tory donors" have dirty money???

 

[Notch7]

Are you insinuating that all "tory donors" have dirty money???

I am saying the the Tory party have not sanctioned Russian Oligarchs that donated to the party.

 

[The Samaritan]

I am saying the the Tory party have not sanctioned Russian Oligarchs that donated to the party.

In that case, it just shows how honest and caring this gov is. However, they can't be that bad can they as putin is bad the west is all celan and good, yes!! No?? yes!! No???

 

[transam]

What the armchair strategist hear miserably fail to acknowledge/understand is the nukes kilotonage, fact

North Korea many only have a handful of nukes but their capacity is massive I have been advised by an unnamed source who is in the know about items of this nature.

Th

so u need a source to tell you that nuclear weapons can be some what devasting


Jeez us wept no flies on you

 

[albaPhenom]

What the armchair strategist hear miserably fail to acknowledge/understand is the nukes kilotonage, fact

North Korea many only have a handful of nukes but their capacity is massive I have been advised by an unnamed source who is in the know about items of this nature.

Th

Out of interest, whereabouts in the world are you from Humanitarian?

 

[transam]

He’s in Moscow

 

[The Samaritan]

Out of interest, whereabouts in the world are you from Humanitarian?

You won't believe me even if I told you.

 

[albaPhenom]

You won't believe me even if I told you.

Really? Why not?

Now I’m intrigued … try me.

 

[transam]

You won't believe me even if I told you.

Transam has access to tech

your posting from Russia but bouncing a signal via

Berkenhead

Transam is not easily fooled and can sniff out Russian propaganda