Yes the EU can grow by having more countries in the Union.Looks like growth to me
What stopped the UK from growing its economy inside the EU?That was part of the referendum question and the UK voted to leave, so now the question is how does the UK grow its economy seperately from the EU. Apparently James Dyson believes it's better to take his business to Asia and grow it there.
He could've moved to Asia whilst we were a member of the EUIf the EU is so f'cking good, why didn’t he move there? If we were still in the EU, he would STILL have moved to Asia so it’s feck all to do with Brexit really.
Same reason as it ever was - Cheap labour.
Asian Coolies get twice the work done for half the wage.
Because he wanted cheap labour.
Is that a serious question.Would we be better off in the EU as it is today?
Given the problems facing the EU are not too dissimilar to the problems facing the UK i'd say it's a valid question.Is that a serious question.
It is easily answered by showing how much better off we are outside it.
It's already Federalised, as i said. You're starting to sound like Claudius arguing for the return of the Roman Republic as the Empire grew into an Imperial state.Yes the EU can grow by having more countries in the Union.
I believe you said the EU can't grow without federalisation, increasing the numbers of members does not assume federalisation.
IR rates.What stopped the UK from growing its economy inside the EU?
When we were a member I remember the shops being full of goods from China, India, America, Vietnam, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, Japan etc etc.
The 3 global economic superpowers are the EU, China, America....we stand zero chance of getting a trade deal with China or America.
It was always a false argument to claim EU membership restricted our opportunities in a meaningful way.
Easily answered as I said.Given the problems facing the EU are not too dissimilar to the problems facing the UK i'd say it's a valid question.
No, but Brexit was. Little crowns on pint pots, 750k per annum influx and record numbers of brown people in boats.Britain not having the € was never about keeping the crown on the pint pot.
Reds under the bed stuffIR rates.
Brexit.
All of the arguments for and against etc, etc, etc.
Probably one of the most significant financial events to happen to the union ever.
Do we actually think that the establishment (no, not the nobs in parliament, the ones who pull the levers behind the curtains) would have allowed Brexit to happen if it was ultimately destructive for the UK?
You have to read between the lines.
I've no idea what the thoughts are of the establishment behind closed doors. we can only speculate.
However, Financial independence must be a massive factor. Controlling your own IR is vital to an economy.
I think this is the main factor for brexit tbh.
We pulled out of the ERM because of it.
Britain not having the € was never about keeping the crown on the pint pot.
Only the dim and short sighted would think this.
That is your opinion, it does not make it fact.It's already Federalised, as i said
WhatabouteryYou're starting to sound like Claudius arguing for the return of the Roman Republic as the Empire grew into an Imperial state.
or you could say:
"the EU is already federalised, here is my evidence to support that claim....."