I suspect he really meant a 'political structure'.It's a political system, you say...like Communism?
It might be more accurate than a 'political system'. But the two might be interchangeable.
I suspect he really meant a 'political structure'.It's a political system, you say...like Communism?
It's not a case of not caring more a case of being realistic. Nothing stays the same, think of all the workers in heavy industry that got thrown on the scrap heap.I get it that you don't care about people who make a lifestyle choice based on the existing and foreseeable regulations and conditions.
Then their life is in turmoil because a tiny majority of Brits want to change those rules and conditions for no benefit whatsoever.
Exactly. Freedom of movement is about the right to live and work in another EU country.
It's not about popping over the border for a bit of shopping.
Yeah, they can still do it but it costs more and takes longer to navigate customs.
Get the violins out.
I'm glad you had second thoughts.It's not a case of not caring ...
When there are structural changes made some consideration is given to the socio-economic changes, affecting the communities.... more a case of being realistic. Nothing stays the same, think of all the workers in heavy industry that got thrown on the scrap heap.
Call it an Entity, if you like.I suspect he really meant a 'political structure'.
It might be more accurate than a 'political system'. But the two might be interchangeable.
It wasn't bleeding obvious that the Tory party would hold a referendum to save the Tory party from disintegration.I get me violins out at a drop of a hat.
Why would stating the bleeding obvious be a second thought, it's you who didn't consider what you was spouting.
And dismissed.When there are structural changes made some consideration is given to the socio-economic changes, affecting the communities.
And how long was Farage campaigning for a referendum, it's not like a 2nd referendum couldn't happen given his rise in popularity.It wasn't bleeding obvious that the Tory party would hold a referendum to save the Tory party from disintegration.
Party above country is their mantra now.
That'll do.Call it an Entity, if you like.
My comment about the entity of the EU was apolitical.Guy Verhofstadt wants to extinguish national sovereignty...In fact, he’s put together a plan for further EU integration. Snappily entitled, “Report on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties”, it proposes to massively restrict the right of member states to veto EU measures. Other features include the “establishment of a defence union including military units […] under the operational command of the Union”; exclusive EU “competence” (i.e. control) over environment and climate policy; and a “strengthening” of the “Union’s common immigration policy”.
This week the European Parliament voted in favour of his proposals by 291 to 274. That’s not enough to make them law: treaty change would require the unanimous approval of all 27 member states. Nevertheless, the idea that full-blown federalism is a minority pursuit, or a Brexiteer conspiracy theory, is blatantly wrong. The Verhofstadt view of the EU’s future commands a majority among the Union’s directly elected politicians.
Who's Farage?And how long was Farage campaigning for a referendum, it's not like a 2nd referendum couldn't happen given his rise in popularity.
More than a bummer, it would make a lot of noise and cause a catastrophe.Bit of a bummer when you set your sights on a railway then drop it halfway through.
No answer to that one then. Notice this about you bloomers you go a bit a silly when your found wanting.More than a bummer, it would make a lot of noise and cause a catastrophe.
He will be that bloke that's never been elected to the house of frauds, whose changed the course of history that those in there could ever hope to do.Who's Farage?
Only the ultra-right listens to old Fagarse.