S
sodthisforfun
SHE didn't have a passport. That was what I was talking about. A passport is what enabled the journo to travel with freely. The mother and the baby did NOT have passports. Babies need passports.
So the context was firmly established. The issue being discussed was that of the problems/risks of sending people to the camp to bring Shamima Begum and her baby back to the UK. Bod raised that concern and jason pointed out that a newspaper reporter had managed to get in and out
And it was at that point that you wrote:
So no, chalk and cheese were not being compared.
A newspaper reporter and hypothetical people sent to bring Shamima Begum and her baby back to the UK were being compared.
The reporter had a passport, and anybody sent to bring Shamima Begum and her baby back to the UK would have a passport.
The reporter did not belong to a terrorist group, and nobody sent to bring Shamima Begum and her baby back to the UK would have belonged to one.
So what did you think was being compared when you quoted a post about a reporter and wrote what you did about him having a passport etc?
Journo with passport not a member of a terrorist group = travel freely to the UK.
Woman & baby without passports with woman a member of a terrorist group = not able to travel freely to the UK.
Chalk and cheese.
How are they supposed to quickly leave a country? Bearing in mind, we are not talking about a lady who simply lost her passport on holiday, this was a lady who belonged to a terrorist group in a country that is in disarray, these are not normal, easy to sort out circumstances. There are barely any hospitals left standing, there is no functioning UK embassy in Syria. As I said before again and will say again, it was not a simple task and the likelyhood of sorting it all out within 2 weeks were slim.
Last edited by a moderator: