I hope you aren't going to try and pretend that if we did not allow French companies to operate here that this sort of thing wouldn't happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consulting_Association
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consulting_Association
Sponsored Links
Probably exactly the same that they, and "leftie leavers", think of exactly the same practices when engaged in by UK companies.
Indeed not.
As long as you allow our elected representatives to decide what laws we should have, and you allow our courts to rule on matters of law.
The only problem with all of that is that the ECHR is nothing to do with the EU, it is not an EU institution, it's jurisdiction extends to all 47 countries who are members of the Council of Europe.
Which is also not an EU institution.
Sponsored Links
Great comment there:
"A few years ago Theresa pointed out that the Tories were seen as the nasty party. Most thought it was a lament. It is looking more and more like a boast."
One of the key writers that drew up the convention was............. a UK conservative MP.
Also the first signatory to the ECHR.........The UK
And when was that?
After the NHS was set up.....but before colour TV
S
SammyInnit
I'm talking about working conditions and it's no surprise France has one of the highest rates of injury and mortality in the workplace.
Pardon me for not wanting to work for companies that don't care.
So before or after we joined the EU?
Because he is wrong about it.
No political party has a monopoly on its MPs, its members, its supporters or its voters being wrong. Or right.
Not all Tory MPs think we should leave, and not all Labour ones think we should stay. And vice-versa.
Not all Tory voters voted to leave, and not all Labour voters voted to remain. And vice-versa.
One of the reasons that everything is such a mess in Parliament is that it is organised and runs on party political lines, and Brexit has taken a wrecking ball to that because it is not a party political issue for the two main parties.
Both leaders of those two have huge problems because of the discrepancy between what they are doing, either out of genuine long-held personal conviction or because they are going along with the referendum result, and what their MPs want, and (particularly in the case of Labour) what the majority of their party members want.
The thing is, she can't, and she never could. EU membership has been a festering sore in the Tory party for ever, and to turn that metaphor into an analogy, ignoring it has now made it so bad that gangrene has set in and amputation (of the ERG wing) is now essential if the entire patient (the Tory party) is not to die.
Corbyn & Labour are not a great deal better off.
The EU doesn't determine the rate of minimum pay , the origins of UK unfair dismissal law predates membership of the EU.
The fact that you accept that most labour laws that protect workers rights are of British origin and not European sort of weakens your argument for continuing membership of the EU.
British Labour law in some respects is superior to European labour law.
So now that you accept there is one less reason for staying in EU can you think of any others.
since my belief in the benefits of EU membership are not wholly or mainly based on the UK's poor record on workers rights, you are, as usual, talking nonsense.
And you failed on that, too.
I am glad you have admitted that the rights of British workers are not a major concern to you.
So what are your beliefs in the benefits of EU membership based on then.
If you don't really care about the rights of British workers what do you care about.
You believe in Freedom of movement, you don't like plumbers, is there a connection.
Maybe you want revenge and would to see the country flooded with cheap Polish plumbers to undercut and destroy the livelyhood of British plumbers.
You sound suspiciously middle class.
This forum sucks.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
