Yeah, the forelock-tuggers love all that.As ever, good sense from R&C. To say thay I am "in favour" of the British monarchy doesn't quite explain the patriotic British man's position. WE are subjects of The King, and should seek HIS favour. However, if he is not worthy it is a different story. In troubled times bad kings were deposed by better individuals or families. Queen Elizabeth II was worthy. So is Charles, and so is Anne, but I worry about the rest of them.
I fear Charles is too concerned with "green" matters, but I hope being King makes him shape himself. I would like him to start by being regal, imperious and censorious and doing everything the anti-royalists dislike. If he tries to please them, he is finished.
QEII's 'job' was to rebrand the empire as the commonwealth, King Charles Spaniel's 'job' will as a figurehead for the 'Green New Deal' aka more of the same exploitation by globalists.
The other fella, R&C, who mentioned King Charles Spaniel and the WEF is bang on. He's in it up to his eyeballs. After all, it was him who launched 'The Great Reset'.