illegal fugee makes a mint

[Freddie]

I've just scanned that link. Are you saying Freddie, that most of the information in that link is deceiving?

What i am saying oilman is that he had a job to do and has been made a scapegoat for doing his job.

If the job of bomber command is not drop bombs and destroy and kill then what is it?

 

[Softus]

Quite frankly, IMHO we should be able to express an opinion without being accused of rascism

And should anyone be able to express a racist opinion without being accused of racism? Or to be stupid and bigoted without it being pointed out?

 

[Freddie]

Quite frankly, IMHO we should be able to express an opinion without being accused of rascism

And should anyone be able to express a racist opinion without being accused of racism? Or to be stupid and bigoted without it being pointed out?

AAh loony left returns, just because we dont have your views whatever they are we are racist and now stupid

 

[joe-90]

Asylum seekers aren't allowed to work.

 

[joe-90]

I wish people using the word 'racist would actually take the time to learn what it means. The definition is:

1) The prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races.

2) Discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race.


An observation that economic migrants/illegal immigrants are abusing the asylum system is NOT racist.

However. If I say that I am 'patriotic' and rate my people higher than other races - then that is in fact racist.


joe

 

[Softus]

Ok then, reading Kendor's link re-enforced my view that Harris was only one step up from a war criminal and he should have been booted out of the RAF before he had a chance to do any harm.

Your mad !!!

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman when they could have just shot the plane up if they had taken much more care.

Now you are loony left !

Freddie, you seem to be labelling everyone who disagrees with you as (a) left and (b) loony. Moreover, you frequently associate the two as being one and the same. Does this mean that you're a loony righty? If not, then how would you prefer to be labelled?

Here's another idea - take a comment written by another poster, form your opinion about it, and post your reply without being abusive or critical.

Also, try to reply just to that point, rather than extrapolate it to an extreme that is clearly ridiculous and then accuse the poster of having a ridiculous opinion.

For example, instead of this:

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman...

You could write this:

I don't agree with your interpretation of history there. Would you apply this to every airman in the RAF, or are you just talking about one of them?

If we do this then we might have a reasoned debate, not a game of historical ping pong where we have to go running to the corner of the room to retrieve the ball after each failed smash.

It's just an idea - are you open-minded enough to give it a try?

 

[petewood]

Your mad !!!

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman when they could have just shot the plane up if they had taken much more care.

Now you are loony left !

Spitfire pilots didn't orchestrate dropping thousands of tons of incendiary bombs on women and children especially when we already had the upper hand in the war in 1945.

Spitfire pilots didn't use bombing raids to drop poison gas on Iraqi tribesmen in the 1930's.

Harris did both of these things.

If you think these are acceptable acts of war then I would have to say that it's you who's the loony.

 

[Softus]

...We have to keep him alive and provide for him for the rest of his life. We have to give him drugs to repress his illness during which time he can go out and spread the disease to all and sundry.

Well we do, but you won't until you start paying taxes in 10 years time.

 

[joe-90]

...We have to keep him alive and provide for him for the rest of his life. We have to give him drugs to repress his illness during which time he can go out and spread the disease to all and sundry.

Well we do, but you won't until you start paying taxes in 10 years time.

What were you saying to Freddie about posting abuse? If you can't face me head-on in a debate - please ignore my posts.

There's a good chap.



joe

 

[Freddie]

Ok then, reading Kendor's link re-enforced my view that Harris was only one step up from a war criminal and he should have been booted out of the RAF before he had a chance to do any harm.

Your mad !!!

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman when they could have just shot the plane up if they had taken much more care.

Now you are loony left !

Freddie, you seem to be labelling everyone who disagrees with you as (a) left and (b) loony. Moreover, you frequently associate the two as being one and the same. Does this mean that you're a loony righty? If not, then how would you prefer to be labelled?

Here's another idea - take a comment written by another poster, form your opinion about it, and post your reply without being abusive or critical.

Also, try to reply just to that point, rather than extrapolate it to an extreme that is clearly ridiculous and then accuse the poster of having a ridiculous opinion.

For example, instead of this:

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman...

You could write this:

I don't agree with your interpretation of history there. Would you apply this to every airman in the RAF, or are you just talking about one of them?

If we do this then we might have a reasoned debate, not a game of historical ping pong where we have to go running to the corner of the room to retrieve the ball after each failed smash.

It's just an idea - are you open-minded enough to give it a try?

But you see Softus, this is a forum and as long as we dont break the rules we can express our views and not have to be told what we must think or say from other people.

For example----you have labelled me a racist and a bigot and stupid but never explained why, but probably because i posted that i dont like or trust muslims anymore because of what happened and also because of some of the things they have said about their views to westerners---amazing

Even more amazing you made the wild outragious claim that England has always accepted immigration because it's part of the very fabric, and then wonder off back to the viking days.

I dont believe you know anything about why immigrants were first let into the country or why

It is never ok to make wild claims or accusations without backing them up with a bit of fact unless you are going to say the Viking raiders came with a passport or applied for asylem.

 

[oilman]

Isn't joe-90, 15 years old? ie born 1990?

 

[Freddie]

Your mad !!!

Suppose on your thinking every Spitfire pilot should be court marshalled actually killing a German airman when they could have just shot the plane up if they had taken much more care.

Now you are loony left !

Spitfire pilots didn't orchestrate dropping thousands of tons of incendiary bombs on women and children especially when we already had the upper hand in the war in 1945.

Spitfire pilots didn't use bombing raids to drop poison gas on Iraqi tribesmen in the 1930's.

Harris did both of these things.

If you think these are acceptable acts of war then I would have to say that it's you who's the loony.

Told you in my earlier post Petewood only 2 rules of war --survive and win and by the way it was the Germans who perfected incendary bombing on British cities when they had the very much upperhand before Harris ever thought of using it.

 

[oilman]

..................

Told you in my earlier post Petewood only 2 rules of war --survive and win and by the way it was the Germans who perfected incendary bombing on British cities when they had the very much upperhand before Harris ever thought of using it.

Oh dear, does that mean the Japanese were ok after all, surviving but then breaking the second rule by losing?

 

[Freddie]

..................

Told you in my earlier post Petewood only 2 rules of war --survive and win and by the way it was the Germans who perfected incendary bombing on British cities when they had the very much upperhand before Harris ever thought of using it.

Oh dear, does that mean the Japanese were ok after all, surviving but then breaking the second rule by losing?

Oilman its pointless you know what the Jap thread was about and why--does this mean that now you have gone back to that silly point scoring routine? or will you stoop to following people around the forum again and posting silly wittisms to each and every post?

 

[Softus]

What were you saying to Freddie about posting abuse? If you can't face me head-on in a debate - please ignore my posts.

Good one joe. Head on? Don't make me laugh. You haven't stuck to a single point since you turned 8.