I assume that your standard of luxury is a Fiat 127
Well then, tell us what YOUR standard(s) of "luxury" are. Tell us what features a car has to have, in your eyes, to qualify as a "luxury car".
You must be able to do that, as you're conducting your side of the debate logically, no?
They are sound, scientifically based, models of different scenarios.That graph up there is pure fantasy from 2000 onwards.
Pure speculation.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that you personally know absolutely nothing about climatology, atmospheric science, etc, and that therefore when you make the claim that all the tens, hundreds of thousands of people who do actually know about it are wrong then:
a) it does really make you look incredibly foolish
b) you're just repeating lies told to you by other people who also know absolutely nothing about climatology & atmospheric sciences, which you have been credulous enough to swallow.
You wanting drastic climate change not to be happening is not enough to justify promulgating the lies of people who really do not have your interests at heart, nor will it change reality.
Stop listening to and repeating the words of liars.
I remember when the "scientists" started the disaster fairy tale in the 80s.
So far they haven't got one of their prediction right, not a single one.
Another gobsmacking untruth from you.
Did they now.I remember the "experts" who said that in 2010 London would have tropical climate and be on the beach: they conned me!
Well - I'm sure you can prove that, and you really do need to, because I'm afraid that your credibility, as evinced by what you have said so far, is zero, and without proof of what you say no sane, intelligent person can believe a single thing you say.