LABC being uncooperative

wrong.

how is the op expected to track and repair faults in the existing wiring ?

sure he could end up with a new cu and one where the RCDs constantly trip before the formal testing takes place
Please would you quote the section of Approved Document Part P which states that, when using the LABC rather than a Competent Person or Third Party Certification scheme, the installer must inspect and test their installation? I'll save you the time: there isn't one.

Yes, I could install a dodgy system which doesn't work or is utterly condemnable, but that is for the LABC to determine, not me. It'd be a waste of time and money, so I'll be testing throughout, but it's all compliant with part P.
 
Sponsored Links
Please would you quote the section of Approved Document Part P which states that, when using the LABC rather than a Competent Person or Third Party Certification scheme, the installer must inspect and test their installation? I'll save you the time: there isn't one.

Yes, I could install a dodgy system which doesn't work or is utterly condemnable, but that is for the LABC to determine, not me. It'd be a waste of time and money, so I'll be testing throughout, but it's all compliant with part P.

Wrong again

I’m just pointing out your planned work may leave you with an unusable Electrical set up in your home.

I never said anything about who does the inspecting or testing
 
Wrong again

I’m just pointing out your planned work may leave you with an unusable Electrical set up in your home.

I never said anything about who does the inspecting or testing
If my interpretation of part P is correct, the LABC will do a test according to BS7671, so it should be very much useable if they sign it off.
 
If my interpretation of part P is correct, the LABC will do a test according to BS7671, so it should be very much useable if they sign it off.

so it’s Monday and you change your CU - the RCDs won’t hold, so no circuits can work and LABC aren’t coming for 3 weeks ……

this has absolutely nothing to do with part p

an older CU may have many existing faults that it won’t detect, a new CU will

don‘t you understand this ?
 
Sponsored Links
so it’s Monday and you change your CU - the RCDs won’t hold, so no circuits can work and LABC aren’t coming for 3 weeks ……

this has absolutely nothing to do with part p

an older CU may have many existing faults that it won’t detect, a new CU will

don‘t you understand this ?
Guess I'll fit the CU the night before!
I do understand your point, and I plan to test throughout with what equipment I have, though I don't have anything like a Megger so I'll be somewhat dependent on the LABC.
That said I'd wager that there are well in excess of a million homes in this country with perfectly useable and safe electrical systems that have never been Meggered and were installed by someone with less diligence than I.
 
Please would you quote the section of Approved Document Part P which states that, when using the LABC rather than a Competent Person or Third Party Certification scheme, the installer must inspect and test their installation? I'll save you the time: there isn't one.
Quite. There wouldn't really be a need for the 'LABC route' if everyone who used it was fully competent and equipped to undertake I&T to the required standard.
Yes, I could install a dodgy system which doesn't work or is utterly condemnable, but that is for the LABC to determine, not me. It'd be a waste of time and money, so I'll be testing throughout, but it's all compliant with part P.
Quite so. As I wrote before, the LABC can only fail to issue a completion certificate if they deem the work to have been non-compliant and, as we've both said, if one is using the LABC route, only the LABC can determine (by means of the I&T they charge for) if that is the case.

Kind Regards, John
 
Wrong again I’m just pointing out your planned work may leave you with an unusable Electrical set up in your home.
I'm struggling to understand exactly where you are 'coming from'. What you say above could apply, to a lesser or greater extent, to any electrical work if the person concerned did not have the necessary knowledge, skill or equipment to deal with 'problems', whether the workdone was notifiable or not. Are you just 'anti' DIY electrical work, or what?
 
I do understand your point, and I plan to test throughout with what equipment I have, though I don't have anything like a Megger so I'll be somewhat dependent on the LABC.
In reality, if you have an electrical installation which is 'usable' now, it's very unlikely that you would need 'a Megger' to sort out anything you did which rendered the installation 'unusable'.

I think some 'prophets of doom' may be participating in this discussion :)

Kind Regards, John
 
Quite. There wouldn't really be a need for the 'LABC route' if everyone who used it was fully competent and equipped to undertake I&T to the required standard.
Yep, it's completely paradoxical.. makes me doubly certain that the LABC officer I've spoken to either hasn't read Part P, doesn't understand it, or just wants to keep his seat warm..
In reality, if you have an electrical installation which is 'usable' now, it's very unlikely that you would need 'a Megger' to sort out anything you did which rendered the installation 'unusable'.
I think the only BS7671 test I'll be unable to do is the 'insulation resistance' test, though I'm happy to trust the cable manufacturer there..
 
I think the only BS7671 test I'll be unable to do is the 'insulation resistance' test,
Well no. Before energising you would need a calibrated low ohm resistance meter. Several basic "dead" tests to do here including continuity and polarity. Also documenting the R1+R2 of the circuit. Measuring insulation resistance of a circuit is not just the cables, but also tests the accessories and the connections that you have made. Once energy has been applied you'll need to determine the Zs of the circuits and test if the RCDs/RCBOs are in spec (there's a particular tester for that job).

Lots to know and understand, and you wont get that just by owning a copy of the "regs":

But I wish you luck in your discussions with LABC. Like most organisations they are buried in work and anyone throwing an 'off the wall' hand grenade into their processes will be met with the resistance that you have found. In my experience, if you prod the bear he will make your life very difficult indeed.
 
Yep, it's completely paradoxical.. makes me doubly certain that the LABC officer I've spoken to either hasn't read Part P, doesn't understand it, or just wants to keep his seat warm..
Quite. As I implied, if people who used the 'LABC route' were all "fully competent and equipped to undertake I&T to the required standard" they would essentially be equivalent to CPS members, even if they had not proved their abilities to the CPS and paid their membership fee - so 'the LABC route' would not be needed.
I think the only BS7671 test I'll be unable to do is the 'insulation resistance' test, though I'm happy to trust the cable manufacturer there..
Faulty cables are by no means the only cause of low insulation resistance. Do you have the means of measure loop impedances etc. (EFLI, Zs or whatever)?

Kind Regards, John
 
Well no. Before energising you would need a calibrated low ohm resistance meter. Several basic "dead" tests to do here including continuity and polarity. Also documenting the R1+R2 of the circuit. Measuring insulation resistance of a circuit is not just the cables, but also tests the accessories and the connections that you have made. Once energy has been applied you'll need to determine the Zs of the circuits and test if the RCDs/RCBOs are in spec (there's a particular tester for that job).

Lots to know and understand, and you wont get that just by owning a copy of the "regs":

But I wish you luck in your discussions with LABC. Like most organisations they are buried in work and anyone throwing an 'off the wall' hand grenade into their processes will be met with the resistance that you have found. In my experience, if you prod the bear he will make your life very difficult indeed.
Thanks.. I thought BS7671 covered testing procedures which included the dead & live tests you've mentioned?

I don't know how much sympathy I can muster for my LABC... not only are they simply lying about my right to do this work, but they usually contract out the I&T, and they don't need to do respond to my notification, so it's not like their workload just doubled..
 
But I wish you luck in your discussions with LABC. Like most organisations they are buried in work and anyone throwing an 'off the wall' hand grenade into their processes will be met with the resistance that you have found. In my experience, if you prod the bear he will make your life very difficult indeed.
That's very true, but I wouldn't have thought that a DIYer wanting to notify electrical work would be an exceptionally rare " 'off the wall' hand grenade" event, would it? I would have thought that such situations would be pretty common, and that they are one of the main reasons for the existence of a "notify LABC directly" route?

I think that the OP is probably pretty unlucky in terms of the individuals (or maybe whole LABC) he is having to deal with. My personal experiences are certainly much happier ones.

Kind Regards, John
 
I also wanted to go down the LABC compliance certificate. They did not refuse, but wanted to use third party inspectors which I would need to pay for.

Also power removed while I did the work, and not put on again until a satisfactory report is filed. So looking at a week without power.

In the end they inspected my calibration certificates and my C&G 2391 and degree and allowed me to do whole job.

But to have used the third party inspector would have cost more than using a scheme member to do whole job.

And clearly would not be able to live in the house while the work was being done.
 
Thanks.. I thought BS7671 covered testing procedures which included the dead & live tests you've mentioned?
BS7671 has a chapter on testing, but you need adequate test equipment and the knowledge of what to expect, what the limits are etc....

I don't know how much sympathy I can muster for my LABC... not only are they simply lying about my right to do this work, but they usually contract out the I&T, and they don't need to do respond to my notification, so it's not like their workload just doubled..
I have heard of them reluctantly working with someone who has the qualifications and equipment to comply with BS7671, but they really really dont want to go down that road. They dont ever want to have to come to site for a tiddly little job like this. here's how they like it:
Electrician who is a member of one of the CPS schemes (NICEIC, NAPIT, etc) does a notifiable job. Electrician certifies it and notifies to their CPS. The CPS electronically messages the LABC who logs the work as complying with building regulations.
Under this process the LABC's workload is ZERO.

You may understand therefore, that even if your plan doubles the workload it is going to be much more painful for them than the preferred method!
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top