Male Police can strip search a female.

[blup]

They have the right to choose who searches them. That surely is key to this.

You need to know in order to object.

 

[motorbiking]

Not to mention that its incorrect.

 

[denso13]

You need to know in order to object.

Well that's the same for every police and other authority then. Anyone can break the rules if they so wish.

If a woman request that a biological female searches her, but they use clean shaven Georgina, then that isn't the fault of the policy. It's the fault of the authorising officer. But as I said, that rule breaking wouldn't be restricted to the BTP.

 

[motorbiking]

Where in law does it say you have the right to demand a biological female conducts the search?

Literally just making it up.

 

[noseall]

Lets take a look at sec 3.5 for example

1. 3.5. Statutory searches specifically Strip and EIP Searches under Sections 9 through to 12 within Code C, Annex A of The Police and Criminal Evidence act and Annex C of the Code of Practice on the Exercise by Constables of Powers of Stop and Search of the Person in Scotland specifically require that the officer and the subject must be the same sex. For searches conducted under these powers particularly the provisions set under for searches under Section 54 and 55 of PACE.1984, BTP officers/Staff will only search persons of the same sex as either their Birth Certificate or GRC.

Born Male searching born female.

Do you want to go through the other sections too?

The wording looks great.

In the real world - not happening. Never in a million. Zilch. Zero.

Anoraks and head scarfs - maybe. Even that would be unlikely.

 

[motorbiking]

What is your understn

The wording looks great.

In the real world - not happening. Never in a million. Zilch. Zero.
View attachment 367850

Anoraks and head scarfs - maybe.

So it was a waste of time putting the policy together and they could quite easily withdraw it? I wonder why they didn't.

Can't be a good use of public money to defend a judicial review for a policy that is pointless.

Or is it that you are completely wrong as usual.

 

[noseall]

So it was a waste of time putting the policy together and they could quite easily withdraw it? I wonder why they didn't.

Boxes need to be ticked.

There is not a scenario in your wildest imagination, that will come together to allow a man-woman to strip search a woman. It's why no one has an issue with it.

 

[motorbiking]

 

[noseall]

 

[noseall]

But they do.

Where? When? Which nick was it at?

 

[motorbiking]

I already posted what the rules say.

 

[noseall]

But they do.

Where? When? Which nick was it at?

Reality - never in a million years boyo.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Where? When? Which nick was it at?

Reality - never in a million years boyo.

Yes but......


Press release

 

[blup]

Well that's the same for every police and other authority then. Anyone can break the rules if they so wish.

The true biological identity of a trans woman cannot be revealed, it’s entirely possible that colleagues don't know. That would be breaking the rules

If a woman request that a biological female searches her, but they use clean shaven Georgina, then that isn't the fault of the policy. It's the fault of the authorising officer. But as I said, that rule breaking wouldn't be restricted to the BTP.

The policy doesn't contemplate that option, it only contemplates that to all intents and purposes there is no difference between biological woman and a trans woman. Misunderstanding your own policy and then failing to implement the mistake isn't a defence to anything.

 

[denso13]

The policy doesn't contemplate that option,

Contemplate what? The ability of the the person being searched to choose who searches her?

That would be breaking the rules

Yes, that could happen in any force, including the Met.