thats cumulative casesJust a little something for you to ponder on, I know why, lets see if you do?
View attachment 272163
View attachment 272164
what a numpty
thats cumulative casesJust a little something for you to ponder on, I know why, lets see if you do?
View attachment 272163
View attachment 272164
all of those sources are just promoting the lie.Fill your boots, these are just the recent ones.
List of 30 studies showing face masks are ineffective against COVID-19
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385v1.full-text
https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(91)90148-2/pdf90148-2/pdf)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/2020071...ntary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25776/r...-masks-for-the-covid-19-pandemic-april-8-2020
https://www.nap.edu/read/25776/chapter/1#6
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599448/
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y
https://clinmedjournals.org/article...ases-and-epidemiology-jide-6-130.php?jid=jide
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1130147308702355
List of 30 studies showing face masks are ineffective against COVID-19
impressive
you havent read any of those studies, youve just cut n pasted it from your aunt Nellies facebook pageList of 30 studies showing face masks are ineffective against COVID-19
Ive just browsed it -most of it is totally irrelevantNo, the data I'm showing you is just more believable, because there's much more of it.
"In conclusion, there is a limited evidence base to support the use of masks and/or respirators in healthcare or community settings. Mask use is best undertaken as part of a package of personal protection, especially including hand hygiene in both home and healthcare settings."
I used the same rebuttal you usedThat's a really convincing rebuttal.
"Despite the current limited scientific data detailing their effectiveness, we support the wearing of face coverings by the public when mandated and when in close contact with people whose infection status they don't know."
cumulative graphs do not show a trendIn the most vaccinated countries, with the trend, how's that 'vaccine' going?
"According to recommendations by the editors of Annals of Internal Medicine, we are retracting our article, “Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2. A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients,” which was published at Annals.org on 6 April 2020 (1).
Do you really think I was responding to you? Really?Your dishonesty isn't exactly a surprise to be fair.
Tik Tok isn't the source, it's just the hosting platform, it's irrelevant to the information being posted on it, it just presents it.
Of course it does. You claimed to have posted things which demonstrate that masks are useless and should not be worn.That doesn't refute the point though does it
That is untrue.That's quite amusing, because it's actually pointing out the unreliability of the PCR test in this context, which is a whole other topic you'll be oblivious to.