It doesn't matter how much of the budget is spent in other territiorial waters, if they are invited to assist in a rescue.
More deaths in the channel.
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Nothing to do with what I posted.
I think it did, that's why I posted it. I provided my justification.
We can agree to disagree, if you like. It's just a difference of opinion.
It's a bit of minutiae.
I asked mb to justify his budget claim; nothing more.
Which is why your postings are nothing to do with what I posted.
Sponsored Links
Yes, and I pointed out that budget spent in others's territorial waters is beside the point. It's irrelevant.
Sure, you may be right to question motorbiking's claims on how the budget is spent.
I was merely poining out that budget spent in other territorial waters is irrelevant. There's no valid reason for some of the budget not to be spent in other's territiorial waters.
So quote motorbiking instead.
They also have the opportunity to waive that and claim asylum in a country of their choosing. Of course they have to pass through other countries to get here.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,578
- Reaction score
- 2,414
- Country
They are forced to. There is no other way.
Must be terrible for them.
There are numerous ways to reduce the cost of processing immigration claims and integrating refugees into British life. At least one was rejected despite a successful pilot, seemingly because it involved being nice to Asylum seekers rather than treating them like prisoners.
If we opened a processing centre in France then boat journeys would drop or maybe stop entirely. It would ruin the profit margin for the criminal gangs and save lives. We won't do it because to a group of the UK population any refugees are unacceptable and because it would probably increase the number of refugees we take.
If we opened a processing centre in France then boat journeys would drop or maybe stop entirely. It would ruin the profit margin for the criminal gangs and save lives. We won't do it because to a group of the UK population any refugees are unacceptable and because it would probably increase the number of refugees we take.
They're foreigners, and many don't want foreigners in UK.
Thye don't care if they're foreigners in need of a safe haven, they're still not wanted.
The French wouldn’t let that happen - who would have to look after them for months until a decision was made? Then, what would happen to those refused asylum?
What makes you think the succesful application rate would change?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,578
- Reaction score
- 2,414
- Country
It has been offered.
France urges UK to open legal migration route amid Channel crisis
French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin urged Britain on Monday to open a legal route for asylum seekers in order to prevent people risking their lives by taking small boats across the Channel to England.
www.france24.com
Nearly two years ago, and still UK refuses to acknowledge the offer.It has been offered.
France urges UK to open legal migration route amid Channel crisis
French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin urged Britain on Monday to open a legal route for asylum seekers in order to prevent people risking their lives by taking small boats across the Channel to England.
Sponsored Links
