Mr Bates and the post office

Sponsored Links
So in your opinion, is that 'way of life' you describe good or bad?
Why? Are you going to 'weaponise' my opinion? I’ll cry, you know I will.

Well it’s obviously good for both the giver and the receiver of course - they wouldn’t do it otherwise. Go ahead, weaponise - Mottie doesn’t care! :ROFLMAO:
 
Why? Are you going to 'weaponise' my opinion? I’ll cry, you know I will.

Well it’s obviously good for both the giver and the receiver of course - they wouldn’t do it otherwise. Go ahead, weaponise - Mottie doesn’t care! :ROFLMAO:
Weaponise?

I was merely asking what you thought of a system that is effectively corruption being a good or bad 'way of life'...

Strange that you have a problem in answering that directly...
 
Sponsored Links
Strange that you have a problem in answering that directly...
I learned from the best. You! Talking of learning, have you learned the difference between the SEIS scheme and furlough yet?
 
Last edited:
Why? Are you going to 'weaponise' my opinion? I’ll cry, you know I will.

Well it’s obviously good for both the giver and the receiver of course - they wouldn’t do it otherwise. Go ahead, weaponise - Mottie doesn’t care! :ROFLMAO:
You can't weaponise an opinion like you weaponise someone's personal data.
Disclosing personal data without the owners permission is probably a criminal offence.
Criticising someone's opinion is a perfectly valid and normal argument tatcic. If it were not so, arguments or discussions would not be allowed.
You've learnt a new word but applied it incorrectly. :rolleyes:
 
Why? Are you going to 'weaponise' my opinion? I’ll cry, you know I will.

Well it’s obviously good for both the giver and the receiver of course - they wouldn’t do it otherwise. Go ahead, weaponise - Mottie doesn’t care! :ROFLMAO:
Corruption will continue as long as people just accept it, or even want it.

Nothing wrong with fair pay for fair work.
 
You can't weaponise an opinion like you weaponise someone's personal data.
Disclosing personal data without the owners permission is probably a criminal offence.
Criticising someone's opinion is a perfectly valid and normal argument tatcic. If it were not so, arguments or discussions would not be allowed.
You've learnt a new word but applied it incorrectly. :rolleyes:
I don't think he likes being found out for what he does.

Or wrongly, enjoys it and revels in it
 
It’s the way of life. If you haven’t learned that by now, you must go around with your eyes shut or not be in business.

So boat people is just a way of life, time you accepted it...

Oh no Mottie hypocrisy incoming...
 
Someone talking on Nicky Campbell now. He was a Postmaster years back and noticed quite a significant financial discrepancy on the system. He reported it to them and was threatened with the sack and prosecution. He refused to back down and eventually a few people from both the Post Office and Fujitsu visited. During their visit, no one in the branch was interacting with the IT system, however it carried out a transaction. The Postmaster said there and then 'the IT system is either faulty or someone is doing things remotely.'

They departed and a few days later the discrepancy miraculously righted itself.


I heard that interview too.

He also added that, some months later, he met with Geoff Hoon, among others.

After hearing the various inputs at the meeting, the caller said that GH advised him to get out of the PO, as it was clearly a crash just waiting to happen again..................
 
Apparently a Fujitsu IT spec has offered to give evidence to the Horizon enquiry, but only if he is protected from prosecution.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top