Worth assessing the benefits of that if it discloses wider wrongdoing.Apparently a Fujitsu IT spec has offered to give evidence to the Horizon enquiry, but only if he is protected from prosecution.
Worth assessing the benefits of that if it discloses wider wrongdoing.Apparently a Fujitsu IT spec has offered to give evidence to the Horizon enquiry, but only if he is protected from prosecution.
Current efforts are focused on compensating the wronged postmasters. If it moves on investigating criminal activity, its the IT guys who will be asked the pertinent questions.Probably a bit late for whistle blowing.
Psst.You can't weaponise an opinion like you weaponise someone's personal data.
Psst.
Have a word with JohnD for me - he has me on ignore apparently. Tell him he's wasting his time trying to weaponise an opinion of mine from a long while back.
View attachment 328639
Brexit. If you don’t care about it, perhaps you should leave.What do you care about then?
It isn't this country, you should leave.
Brexit. If you don’t care about it, perhaps you should leave.
Worth assessing the benefits of that if it discloses wider wrongdoing.
That's different but the principle remains. Also giving statutory immunity creates a precedent for parliament to use it for its own i.e. crooked MP'sHe is the man whose evidence in court led to the convictions.
"The architect of the faulty Horizon IT system, who gave evidence used to convict sub-postmasters, has demanded immunity before agreeing to appear at the public inquiry.
Gareth Jenkins, who is understood to have been instrumental in developing the software as a senior computer engineer at Fujitsu, is under police investigation over his role in the Post Office scandal.
His testimony given in court cases that the Fujitsu IT system was working correctly was central to convictions and repeatedly used by Post Office lawyers.
Tracked down by The Telegraph to his home in Berkshire, Mr Jenkins, 69, said, when asked if he was sorry for what had happened: “I don’t want to talk. I don’t have anything to say to you.”
Telegraph.co.uk
Scum.
(He's being trying to get immunity since (at least) 2022)
Chair gives decision on witness request for undertaking from Attorney General | Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry
Undertaking sought by former Fujitsu employee to limit use of evidence in criminal proceedingswww.postofficehorizoninquiry.org.uk
Opportunistic vote winning, on a national scandal no less.If you were a cynical person, you could say that the current Government are keen to see this through to compensation because it would be a great vote-winner.
But how big a part did the Government play in the issue? The Post Office was obviously Gov-owned, but had recently been privatised.
Fujitsu, I feel are culpable, as are the PO. It is alleged they must have known the system was fallible, and Fujitsu that it was possible for them to access Horizon terminals and make real time alterations.
Then there's the IT expert who knew 20 years ago there were serious flaws with the system. The PO is said to have told him they were disappointed with his opinion and was there anything they could do to change his mind?
Not to mention why nobody in the judiciary asked the question why hundreds of postmasters and mistresses were being accused of defrauding the Post Office.
And how do you compensate people who have committed suicide?
Hasn’t damaged me one teeny weeny bit. What damage has it brought to you personally (and don't say lack of tomatoes - Notch has claimed that one)!