Nadhim Zahawi?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Why did he hide it in an offshore account?
Perhaps he's like some in here that hide behind the anonymity of a forum. Hey, why don’t you ask him? Don’t be annoyed if he just replies with the standard forum annonimaty answer: NOYFB.
 
Perhaps he's like some in here that hide behind the anonymity of a forum. Hey, why don’t you ask him?
I doubt claiming anonymity is a valid excuse for failing to pay your taxes mottie. We are all legally obliged to pay our due taxes. Just another rich sleazy Tory weasel trying to shaft the UK.
 
Sponsored Links
Great to see that nobody has anything sensible to say, to defend deliberately unfair tax laws.
 
The HMRC were asked to confirm under an FOI request, if any ministers had been subject of a tax investigation, wrongly stating they weren't, and have apologised. What are the penalties for the HMRC being careless?

Blup
 
Was this carelessness that involved carelessly setting up overseas companies with professional assistance, carelessly transferring shares around foreign family members to conceal beneficial ownership, carelessly forgetting to register beneficial ownership over many years, carelessly selling the company and making a huge capital gain, carelessly paying expert international tax accountants for many years with the intention of dodging tax, carelessly not reporting the transaction on any tax returns, carelessly paying lawyers to threaten anyone who mentioned it, and finally, carelessly getting caught?

That would be quite a string of carelessness, wouldn't it?

Have you ever been that careless? I haven't.
 
However, this does not look like carelessness. It looks like deliberate deception. Almost as if they wanted to cover up for the boss.

Who are the Ministers who have been in charge of setting the standards for the last twelve years or so?




"Neidle has now used another FOI request to obtain 200 pages of internal departmental emails from May and June last year that discuss his request for information and the FT’s own inquiry.

The heavily redacted cache includes multiple emails between officials. Nicole Newbury, director of wealth and midsized business compliance at HMRC, told colleagues it was important for the FOI response to be “deliberately drafted to be non-disclosive”. Officials agreed to downplay the implications of inquiries, and to tell journalists that investigations “are frequently fairly simple clarification requests” and “can be quite routine”.

FT.com
 
Was this carelessness that involved carelessly setting up overseas companies with professional assistance, carelessly transferring shares around foreign family members to conceal beneficial ownership, carelessly forgetting to register beneficial ownership over many years, carelessly selling the company and making a huge capital gain, carelessly paying expert international tax accountants for many years with the intention of dodging tax, carelessly not reporting the transaction on any tax returns, carelessly paying lawyers to threaten anyone who mentioned it, and finally, carelessly getting caught?

That would be quite a string of carelessness, wouldn't it?

Have you ever been that careless? I haven't.

Whoops, I've just evaded £millions in tax.

What motivates you JohnD'ski? What motivates YOU to generate £millions in potential tax payments?
 
I doubt that you are one of the very few who are net contributors.

I doubt that that you have ever contributed more than you have taken.

Do you understand what a 'Leech' means?

You are a 'Leech'.
 
Evading tax laws has nothing to do with whether you can claim them to be fair or not, JD.
Trying to conflate two shows enthusuasm for appearing to be a ranting, illogical, troll.
Thinking it'll pass for anything else is just feeble.
 
Evading tax laws has nothing to do with whether you can claim them to be fair or not, JD.
It does if the laws overtly favour the wealthy and those laws were deliberately enshrined by a greedy sleazy Tory government that - bless my soul! - happens to favour those very people that introduced the laws in the first place.

Fair my arse.
 
Great to see that nobody has anything sensible to say, to defend deliberately unfair tax laws.
If I was that rich, I’d not be moaning about them and neither would you! You take full advantage of tax avoidance at your level of wealth so why moan at others who are fortunate enough to be wealthier?

If you feel that strongly about it, don’t invest in any tax avoiding schemes such as ISA's, don’t take advantage of the dividend tax allowance and tax rate, don't take advantage of pension tax relief, don't take advantage of the inheritance tax allowance, don’t take advantage of the savings interest allowance, don’t take advantage of your personal tax allowance, don't take advantage of tax drawdown allowance on your pension, don't take advantage of your capital gains allowance don’t take advantage of any tax avoiding schemes at all and just pay tax at the higher rate of everything you earn.

Is that what you want, comrade?
 
Last edited:
Evading tax laws has nothing to do with whether you can claim them to be fair or not, JD.

Apologist mottie disagrees with you.

You even disagree with yourself.

Both of you feel the need to make up fantasies to construct your ad-hominem attacks.

Do you claim the tax laws are fair?
 
Apologist mottie disagrees with you.

You even disagree with yourself.

Both of you feel the need to make up fantasies to construct your ad-hominem attacks.

Do you claim the tax laws are fair?
The apologists usually get their comeuppance one way or another...

You can spot them as they squeal the loudest when the brown stuff descends on them from a great height...

Which is followed by the sound of great merriment from those who are joyously witnessing that which is known as karma(y)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top