New Orleans terror attack

But an innocent mention of land taken out of context provides you with incorrect ammunition against muslims.
And yet you ask him about 'green and pleasant land' or 'land of hope and glory'....silence.

Its not the use of the word land he finds objectionable - it's Muslims.
 
Sponsored Links
And yet you ask him about 'green and pleasant land' or 'land of hope and glory'....silence.

Its not the use of the word land he finds objectionable - it's Muslims.
More lies.

Let’s hope @Notch7 doesn’t get this thread deleted too.
 
And yet you ask him about 'green and pleasant land' or 'land of hope and glory'....silence.

Its not the use of the word land he finds objectionable - it's Muslims.
Probably not even aware that ..stan, as in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kazakhstan etc, simply means land.

Not ourland or captured land or foreign land or anything. Just land. Just like Eng Land
 
Probably not even aware that ..stan, as in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kazakhstan etc, simply means land.

Not ourland or captured land or foreign land or anything. Just land. Just like Eng Land
You're not suggesting Pakiland are you? That's well offensive these days.
 
Sponsored Links
If I had copied and pasted the section as text only I would of been accused of writing it myself
No

All you have to do is quote the text and provide the link…..but you know that

The reason you didn’t is because earlier in the article it says: “communities in our country” which destroys your argument.
 
Can not win on here with the totally radicalised fruitcakes. I was asked for proof - it was provided. I found it by googling it then when on the page I could not see it as it was right on the bottom so i did a simple "find in page" search for the word lands- which is why its highlighted in green. I then did a screenshot of that section. I couldn’t do a screen shot of the whole page as its too big. If I had copied and pasted the section as text only I would of been accused of writing it myself. If I had copied and pasted as text the whole lot than that would be too big - espicually as the relevant section was right at the bottom so I thought the best option was to do a screenshot of that section. Look at the jpeg name, when I do a screen shot the default save name is "capture" so i just randomly tap something else in and save that or delete a few letters - look at the name of the jpeg - its ure - the last bit of capture ! if I got it off the web somewhere then it would have the name the original poster gave it, go and look at my past images and see the names. I did not post the direct link because I am not responding to vitriol and demands by people lashing out with.---Aveatry is a dirty little liar, dishonest person, racist grifting Reform voting cesspit, right wing echo chambers, desperate to post racist smears but are too cowardly to be open about it, Muslim hatred, conspiracy.
If you think I got the notion from somewhere else that I have read it then find it and post it here.
The tangled web of a liar digging himself an ever deeper hole :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:


I was asked for proof - it was provided
No, you were asked for proof that Muslims consider it “Muslim land”.

You are trying to use a simplistic strawman by claiming that if you can find a Muslim saying the word “land” that’s proof It’s not.


Come on Aveatry, it’s time you grew a pair and admit you’ve been found out
 
And not once have you ever criticised right wing extremists
I haven’t criticised this one either so that is a sum total of nothing, go and find me some right wing attacks and I will criticise them for you if it will make you feel better.
But an innocent mention of land taken out of context provides you with incorrect ammunition against muslims.
You got it the wrong way around I said I have heard it - I was asked for an example - I found one very quickly, I could waste my time finding loads more for you if you would like.
 
And yet you ask him about 'green and pleasant land' or 'land of hope and glory'....silence.

Its not the use of the word land he finds objectionable - it's Muslims.
I ignored the green and pleasant land and 'land of hope and glory' because you were being a silly billy.
 
He's just your average low intelligence, Muslim hating troll.

A 'hater'

Funny because in the F1 world for many years people who didn't agree with or weren't fans of Lewis Hamilton were all branded 'haters' by his fans.

Labeling non-fans as "haters" can reflect immaturity and a tribal mindset. It simplifies complex opinions into a binary of with us or against us, which is extreme and unnecessary. People might have valid reasons for not supporting a figure like Lewis Hamilton, such as preferring other drivers or disliking his style or approach, without it being rooted in hate.

No in fact it's blatantly obvious what the brand 'hater' and the lemmings that follow a leader who convince them this label is such, for example:

Shuts down discussion – It discourages healthy debate by framing differing opinions as personal attacks.
Creates echo chambers – It encourages groupthink, where only positive opinions are welcome, reinforcing biased perceptions.
Shows insecurity – Some fans might use the term "hater" to protect their idol from criticism, but it often highlights an inability to handle differing perspectives.

And here you are, a fekin bah sheep echo...
 
I ignored the green and pleasant land and 'land of hope and glory'
Yet in your post, you were very vocal about your being irked at the use of 'land'. Make your mind up boyo.

Still nothing about the relevant bit I see....
and its these "lands" that are there to be turned into muslim lands.

....silence.

Just the usual Muslim hating troll garbage.
 
A 'hater'
Correct.....
When people say oh but they were born here, they fail to realise is that for those muslims their first allegiance is to islam and they do not recognise countries. Listen to how some speak - they only ever mention "lands" and its these "lands" that are there to be turned into muslim lands.


...and troll.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top