Nigels view on how to stop the riots.

How would you know?
You joined less than a month ago, himmy.
I can read. :rolleyes:

Besides, violence against objects is no violence, it's damage.
Whether is criminal or not is debatable.
You have a thesaurus next to your computer, use it for more than trying to sound sophisticated.
So you support criminal damage, but you disagree with violence?
Khan, who has been the subject of conspiracy theories and personal attacks over Ulez
If I had the time and the inclination, I'd search for any of your comments wishing harm to the authorities.

And somehow lately they've been right on many fronts...
Stopped clock, etc.
 
Sponsored Links
I can't hear you Himmy, you're on ignore. Hey, what did you say, still can't hear you!! :LOL::LOL::LOL:

Sorry Himm, speak up! Still can't hear you!!!

Sad, innit. :giggle:
That's not a problem. I can still refute your racist comments with ease. But you choose not see it.
And you openly admit to being a racist.
 
Sponsored Links
Yes, scary reading. 1992 the small population growth was almost completely down to natural growth by indigenous Brits. By 2022, much larger population growth was almost completely due to mass immigration.

Do you not have any relevant and more telling stats of historical UK population totals by year?
The data provides numbers.
Your racist attitude provides your bigoted reasons for the events.
 
And the far left are not violent extremists in UK like they are in France.
In fact, those far left that Sir Keir 'weeded out' could be described as committed pacifists.
Not in the same way the far-right have coalesced around the issues of migration and against Asian communities in the UK. The far-left are more likely to be on the Climate Change bandwagon, harping on about animal rights and peace. They have daft ideas that're mostly harmless, whereas the Fascists are trying to incite the wider population to their viewpoint through violence and disinformation.

Folk in those same communities are against them and stand United against hate.
 
3500.jpg


This is how to stop a riot, Nige.
 
A quick Google brings up this data from Germany. I have no reason to suspect asylum seekers in the U.K. are any different. Would you be happy with those stats for the asylum seekers we take in?

"The group represented roughly 2 percent of the German population by end of 2017, but was suspected of committing 8.5 percent of crimes (violations off the German alien law are not included). The numbers suggest that the differences could at least to some extent have to do with the fact that the refugees are younger and more often male than the average German. The statistics show that the asylum-group is highly overrepresented for some types of crime. They account for 14.3 percent of all suspects in crimes against life (which include murder, manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter), 12.2 percent of sexual offences, 11.4 percent of thefts and 9.7 percent of body injuries. The report also shows differences between the origin of migrants. Syrians are underrepresented as suspects, whereas citizens from most African countries, especially northern Africans are strongly overrepresented. Migrants from Afghanistan and Pakistan are particularly over represented as suspects in sexual offences"
I see you have not provided the source so that you can mix and match some comments to suit your bigoted attitude.
And it doesn't look like a quick google produced that report.
It's either a carefully edited series of sentences from Wikipedia, by you, or by some other person that you have chosen to use instead of the original.


I can just as easily mix and match comments, from the same article, to suit a different opinion:
Crimes may be committed both against and by immigrants in Germany.
a report that was released by the Federal Criminal Police (BKA) stated that "While the number of refugees is rising very dynamically, the development of crime does not increase to the same extent."
there is no relationship between the scale of refugee inflow and the crime rate.[
Several studies carried out since the 1990s have suggested that the collection of accurate and meaningful statistics makes it difficult to obtain an overall picture of the effect of immigration on crime in Germany. For example, second or third generation immigrants may be classified as "foreigners" whilst recent immigrants may be classified as German
Research also suggests that crimes are more likely to be reported, if the suspect is or appears to be a foreigner or immigrant.
each of Germany's 16 states has its own police force, federal authorities do not routinely publish national statistics. These are compiled state by state and are sometimes released only after a parliamentary request.
etc,
 
Looking at only 10 years - 2011 to 2021 - the population rose by more than 4 million
Conservative govt in power all that time


No wonder this country is so screwed
This country is screwed

But the problem is not immigration, the problem is decades of right wing neoliberalism, flogging all our assets to foreign private interests and the vested self interests of big business.


Tory govts caused the problem
Tory govts told you to blame immigrants
 
Not in the same way the far-right have coalesced around the issues of migration and against Asian communities in the UK. The far-left are more likely to be on the Climate Change bandwagon, harping on about animal rights and peace. They have daft ideas that're mostly harmless, whereas the Fascists are trying to incite the wider population to their viewpoint through violence and disinformation.

Folk in those same communities are against them and stand United against hate.
I agree. My original point was that the extreme, and sometimes violent, far left that exists in France does not exist in UK.
So my original point was not really about comparing the extremities of the political landscape in one country, more the comparison of the political landscape in France and UK.
 
I agree. My original point was that the extreme, and sometimes violent, far left that exists in France does not exist in UK.
So my original point was not really about comparing the extremities of the political landscape in one country, more the comparison of the political landscape in France and UK.
Not an easy comparison to make considering the revolution in France succeeded in establishing a Republic while England rejected the idea back in the 17th century.
 
Not an easy comparison to make considering the revolution in France succeeded in establishing a Republic while England rejected the idea back in the 17th century.
Yes, good point.
We weren't discussing the historical aspect, just the current affairs.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top