I don't think that will tell you anything. The demographic for smart meters might be more affluent households with Solar PV, EV charge stations needing EV tariffs and the poorer households had Dumb meters or the other way around. Not to mention the supplier has no incentive to switch an existing pre-pay customer.
Shame. It might help those who claim you are more likely to be disconnected, and easier, with a SM.
So now you are left with all the other evidence, which you dismiss.
My position is that there is no evidence to show that you are more likely to be disconnected or switched with a sm than a dumb meter.
They are not my claims. If someone wants to claim something they should have the decency to back it up.
None of which, has that much relevance, to the majority of bill payers, who pay their energy bills on time. Even for those who do have financial issues, the SM's, as credit meters, give them a big advantage, of knowing precisely how much they are using, and the exact cost, allowing them to budget more easily.
Had you and Noseall said:
then people wouldn't have spent the last few pages telling you, that you are wrong.
100% I have the same opinion regarding police who don't pursue shop lifters. Everyone who pays, pays more because of the people who don't pay.
The easiest way is to prove the claim. Until then my view remains the same, that's if you don't mind of course.
I'm very happy for you to pretend something doesn't exist because you haven't seen it.
The solution is simple.
It's nobody's job to educate you. If you claim X isn't true because you haven't seen proof. Its on you.
So, we can claim anything now and expect to just be believed. Okey dokey...
