Permanent vs. switched live Part 2

[Barsteward]

I'm still waiting for the mod who locked the original thread to have the courtesy to post here the reason why.

He's not going to do that.

Not a matter of being discourtious, but it opens the possibility of an argument. If an argument occurs with a moderator, who will moderate the moderator?

Fair assumption. Have a word with Joe-90, he manages to modify posts (to suit his viewpoint) after a mod locks a thread.

 

[Softus]

Have a word with Joe-90, he manages to modify posts (to suit his viewpoint) after a mod locks a thread.

Do you have an example of where that has happened?

 

[Barsteward]

Do you have an example of where that has happened?

Yes, but would show nothing untoward. You have to be watching the threads to notice.

And yes, i did use the plural.

 

[ebee]

Have a word with Joe-90, he manages to modify posts (to suit his viewpoint) after a mod locks a thread.

Do you have an example of where that has happened?

I can`t remember a contribution by someone called joe-90.
I must be getting old

 

[ban-all-sheds]

.
.

.
.
.

 

[saxondale]

Have a word with Joe-90, he manages to modify posts (to suit his viewpoint) after a mod locks a thread.

Do you have an example of where that has happened?

yep

 

[Softus]

yep

Would you kindly post a link to it?

 

[saxondale]

yep

Would you kindly post a link to it?

because its going to make a difference?

 

[Softus]

because its going to make a difference?

The difference it would make is that you would have substantiated an otherwise implausible and unsubstantiated claim.

 

[Barsteward]

The difference it would make is that you would have substantiated an otherwise implausible and unsubstantiated claim.

???
As previously pointed out, you would need to be watching the thread at the time to be aware of it. Otherwise you will never know.
And how is it implausible???

 

[saxondale]

because its going to make a difference?

The difference it would make is that you would have substantiated an otherwise implausible and unsubstantiated claim.

yeah thought as much, so how many alter egos can one member have ?

 

[Softus]

yeah thought as much

In that case I don't know why you asked the question.

so how many alter egos can one member have ?

One member can have only one user name, but I expect that there's no limit in software as to the number of user names that one person can register, although whether or not the site owner permits that situation to persist is clearly up to him.

 

[saxondale]

yeah thought as much

In that case I don't know why you asked the question.

I didnt you did, I foolishly thought you might have been looking into the problem

 

[ban-all-sheds]

.
.

.
.
.

 

[saxondale]

.
.

.
.
.

what is that supposed to mean ?