Delete - off topic
Hence why I'd deleted it as you were typing thisI would have thought that that is an absurd understanding of the concept of postive discrimination.Perhaps referring to the chap as the person with the stark contrast between lightness of teeth and darkness of skin would have avoided the issueNow if I were Dimbles I would, (like), to say "the black gentleman". I would have thought that's helpful positive discrimination.
That's a fair point. But I think it's a subtle but different point to the one BT was makingOn the contrary - was Dimbleby asking this chap because of his colour, thus exemplifying positive discrimination?And isn't it irrelevant anyway, on a topic discussing positive discrimination?
No idea, but BT's comment seems to suggest it. I don't know if it was a real event, a hypothetical event, or an imaginary event.I was unaware of this. Is he?Why not start a new thread about David Dimbleby's colour blindness?
Quite Dext. It has to be on his terms...On the contrary - was Dimbleby asking this chap because of his colour, thus exemplifying positive discrimination?And isn't it irrelevant anyway, on a topic discussing positive discrimination?
I was unaware of this. Is he?Why not start a new thread about David Dimbleby's colour blindness?
Sorry, BT, but what are you referring to?That's because it would be quick and helpful but, for some reason, it's a big NO-NO. I wasn't being flippant and I don't believe it was answered or a possible reason given.
Perhaps it's time for us both to take a break, a step backwards, and a reflection of our attitudes.This is about positive discrimination, remember. My post was about that topic. When I make a point of observation you always resort to it's absurd or nothing to do with the discussion.
YOU walk the walk why don't you!
Must admit, when I was in A&E in West Middlesex Hospital when I broke my arm, not a single person there seemed to be of English descent (neither staff nor patient), including myself as my old fellas was Polish. Up here in Manchester, completely the opposite seemed to be the case based on observation..How many times has RH told us that the NHS would collapse if it weren't for the migrants?
By which it would seem to follow that it's OK to discriminate in favour of your own kind?I guess it's OK to discriminate against your own kind?
One last quickie before I retire (for the day)How many times has RH told us that the NHS would collapse if it weren't for the migrants? I guess it's OK to discriminate against your own kind?
"Overseas doctors have contributed tremendously to the National Health Service. ......And the NHS wouldn't survive without overseas doctors' contribution" Dr Prabhu told the BBC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27076216[/QUOTE]
Any particular reason?If either of my daughter's brought home a black fella,I wouldn't let him cross the threshold,positive or negative?
Sorry, BT, but what are you referring to?
Ahem, I've got some +dis that would help. Maybe someone can clear this up for me.
It's Question Time on BBC1 and Dimbles is trying to point to the only black fella in an area of the audience. Instead of mentioning him by colour, which would be quick, obvious and we should all be proud of who we are, it goes something like this.
"The gentleman in the blue shirt. Er, next the the woman with horn rim glasses and pink hair" "Yes, you sir".
Now if I were Dimbles I would, (like), to say "the black gentleman". I would have thought that's helpful positive discrimination.
That's because it would be quick and helpful but, for some reason, it's a big NO-NO. I wasn't being flippant and I don't believe it was answered or a possible reason given.
This is about positive discrimination, remember. My post was about that topic. When I make a point of observation you always resort to it's absurd or nothing to do with the discussion.
No, I'll save you some time. Just pretend it never happens; while every one else and his dog knows to what I refer and has happened many times on that and other programs like it.I don't know if it was a real event, a hypothetical event, or an imaginary event. Perhaps a link to the actual event would be good.