Anti UK post!Sometimes I feel the country is against the people.
Watch out, watch out...
There's a notchy about!
Anti UK post!Sometimes I feel the country is against the people.
Hawkeye is very fond of handing out legal advice.
Maybe one day it will be right.
Something's not quite right there then! Either the black lines were added since the Streetview image (i.e. after re-surfacing) you looked up, OR, the camera wasn't actually the early Truvelo camera from 1999. Sorry for any false hope I may have given you in the mean time!
This is the Type Approval from the government for the 'Truvelo Combi smc' camera(i.e. the early one). They are literally not allowed to work without the black lines in the road. I'd guess it was a newer type of Truvelo, like @sodthisforfun mentioned on Sunday.
View attachment 147893
Here's the manual for the camera if you don't believe me!!
http://www.drinkdriving.org/governm...ed-detection/truvelo-combi-s-mc-scs(1999).pdf
1st offence 38 in a 30 as you are below the automatic summons limit, there is a good chance you will be offered speed awareness particularly if its a passenger vehicle and not a commercial vehicle.
can't give you legal advice, but if it was me, I'd fill out the form and take my chances.
At this stage you are only telling them who was driving not pleading guilty to the offence.
There are lots of ways to play silly buggers and even dodge both points and speed awareness, but I'd take it on the chin.
Common law is crapped upon by commercial/admiralty 'law' time and time again because people are ignorant of their rights...Well it's a commercial court doing business -the business is generated from you paying and complying with the process. Lawfully you are quite entitled to return the NIP and write 'no contract, return to sender' but again, there is a lot that go wrong and you need to know your rights. You're better off putting your signature all over it like every other mug and getting shafted, energy better spent elsewhere.
Which do you do, Freeman Hawk?Well it's a commercial court doing business -the business is generated from you paying and complying with the process. Lawfully you are quite entitled to return the NIP and write 'no contract, return to sender' but again, there is a lot that go wrong and you need to know your rights. You're better off putting your signature all over it like every other mug and getting shafted, energy better spent elsewhere.
Common law is crapped upon by commercial/admiralty 'law' time and time again because people are ignorant of their rights...
But as you correctly say, most people will think 'energy better spent elsewhere'...
That's how they (the establishment/vested interests) get away with it - making it as difficult as possible to challenge a corrupt system!
Which do you do, Freeman Hawk?
. . . all legal of course because the rights to the vehicle are with the DVLA which was agreed to by the victim upon signing for the driver's licence. There are ways around this too of course but that's not for here.
So yes pay it and don't forget to come on a public forum to have a moan though
This nonsense you are spouting could actually be quite dangerous to some idiot researching FMOTL who happens to chance upon your gobshite.
For the benefit of potential FMOTL'rs & Truthers, you need to be Googling de-registering & unregistered vehicles. It is possible to hold a UK driving licence & enjoy a non registered vehicle, if you know what you're doing . . .
mind your business.
Edit: changed my tune.
I assume you register the vehicle in a trust etc etc. I'm all ears if you'd like to educate me further ..
There you go again, confirming your total & utter ignorance of yet another subject.
Do I look like your ****ing teacher?