Savile again

The scale of it is alarming :confused: At least 40 potential victims, with lord knows how many witnesses and others involved in either condoning in full knowledge or wilfully ignoring verbal (and indeed possibly written!!!) complaints and reports. How the heck did he avoid being properly brought to account and prosecuted?
 
Sponsored Links
40 potential victims???
I know you said at least but that's less than one a year.
By all accounts he was a lot more prolific than that. God only knows how many victims there were. Like you say the scale is unbelievable, combine that with the fame he enjoyed, and the height of the pedestal he was on and faaaackinelll
 
40+ potential victims? one or two could possibly be silenced but that many? something just doesn't add up,unless there are many more involved in the cover up.
 
40 + potential victims , I saw the word compensation mentioned on TV last night , i.e the BBC will have to offer compensation

That list will grow than ;)
 
Sponsored Links
40 potential victims???
I know you said at least but that's less than one a year.
By all accounts he was a lot more prolific than that. God only knows how many victims there were. Like you say the scale is unbelievable, combine that with the fame he enjoyed, and the height of the pedestal he was on and faaaackinelll
The number 40 came from some headline today of how many women were being interviewed by the police. Like you said, it is likely to be much much higher, and that may well only be those who were compis mentis when he stuck his tongue down their throats or had a quick grope (I'm thinking hospital patients :confused:).
 
It was Anne Frank and go and await it on the holocaust thread. This ones about that pervert savile and the fall out from his perverted life :rolleyes:
 
It was Anne Frank and go and await it on the holocaust thread. This ones about that pervert savile. :rolleyes:
Ah the pedant spots an error.

Perhaps you'd like to correct the Met for saying they are looking into 'allegations'.?
Seems they're being rational too.
 
The error of an ignoramus as opposed to a typo though.

Anne Franks diary doesn't mean that her name was Anne Franks, it means that the diary belonged to her. :mrgreen:

I think you'll find the met said something like following allegations made it has become clear that savile was a predatory paedophile.
Clear that is to anyone with a braincell.
 
I wish people wouldn't do that. There's always a temptation to start counting the fckn things. :mrgreen:
 
I think you'll find the met said something like following allegations made it has become clear that savile was a predatory paedophile.
Clear that is to anyone with a braincell.
I think you'll find I was correct in what I heard on the news. No doubt you'll discount it though because after all, it was the BBC.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top