He's not investigating Savile. He's investigating who else may have been involved.
Whatever he may say about savile is irrelevant to that.
Savile again
- Thread starter sooey
- Start date
He's not investigating Savile. He's investigating who else may have been involved.
Whatever he may say about savile is irrelevant to that.
Sponsored Links
He's not investigating Savile. He's investigating who else may have been involved.
Whatever he may say about savile is irrelevant to that.
Oh dear.
I see that's a hard concept for you to grasp.
On the contrary.
It's you that is struggling. But at least you've been consistent with it.
Sponsored Links
J
joinerjohn
Big problem here is, the authorities are looking for someone to blame. Obviously, they can't blame a dead person, so they're seeking people from up to 40 yrs ago, who apparently knew about JS and the abuse, so they can blame them (for not speaking out, or covering it up at the time)
As Joe said in another post "Wait until the compo claims go in."
As Joe said in another post "Wait until the compo claims go in."
Apparently Plod are now pursuing 340 lines of enquiry, & that does not include every one who got a Jim'll fix it badge.
one of which has come out of the woodwork 22 years later , she felt un comfortable in his presence , so she said
one of which has come out of the woodwork 22 years later , she felt un comfortable in his presence , so she said
I'll try to make this easy for you to follow.
The police know that savile was a pervert who carried out abuse at various locations.
They don't know how many victims there were, and probably never will.
They don't know if others were involved and are trying to find out.
Now, how does stating saviles obvious guilt at the beginning of their inquiry compromise it in any way that would be predjudicial to any other people who may be found to be involved?
If you can answer that you'd better get on to the met and tell them they've fcked up.
as Ellal said in that post, Any just compo claims that stem from that would be thoroughly merited. As they would be in this case for any kids who were abused under the care of some authority such as the BBC or various hospitals.
You really don't get it.
So you'd best explain then.
C
calorific
It's simple
Since the police haven't apparently investigated it fully then there's no case to answer. Moreover, since Saville has neither confirmed nor denied these allegations then he must be presumed innocent and indeed the scores of people coming forward with their stories should all be ignored and presumed to be lying. Yep, that must have been it. Why didn't I think of that.
Well- it seems that some of the 'victims', are now seeking legal advice regarding compensation.
Thats the green light for many many more 'victims' to step forward.
Get ready for the rush !!
Thats the green light for many many more 'victims' to step forward.
Get ready for the rush !!
Well- it seems that some of the 'victims', are now seeking legal advice regarding compensation.
Thats the green light for many many more 'victims' to step forward.
Get ready for the rush !!
Thats the green light for many many more 'victims' to step forward.
Get ready for the rush !!
and all on the basis of an allegation too.
Sponsored Links
