Sex in front of kids

Zampa said:
So, lets assume that the liberals think its ultra trendy to let their kids watch them,
Why assume that?

Its illegal, immoral and could have a very dangerous impact on the kids state of mind.
Probably why it's illegal, then.
 
Sponsored Links
Zampa said:
So, lets assume that the liberals think its ultra trendy to let their kids watch them, where does it stop?...do they just let em watch the 'act' or the whole shebang (scuse the pun).

Ah, this is where it starts. Someone wonders something out loud and before you know it, the Daily Express has a new headline.

Read the whole thread and you'll see that no-one has said anything other than its a very bad idea.
 
Zampa said:
So, lets assume that the liberals think its ultra trendy to let their kids watch them, where does it stop?...do they just let em watch the 'act' or the whole shebang (scuse the pun)

And at what point do the 'lessons' stop?...

"Ok kids...you've seen me and daddy have what is known as normal sex...now watch while daddy tries to serve me one up the trademans"

Its illegal, immoral and could have a very dangerous impact on the kids state of mind.

Who have you ever heard advocating letting their children watch them? 'Lessons'? Where'd you get this one from?

OMG, not 'the liberals' (*spits in disgust*)

Please define what you mean by this term, as I'm not clear who you mean?

Do you agree that Churchill was a 'liberal'?

Here it just appears as a term tainted with negativity.
 
Hmm...no I wasnt refering to the political party I meant 'the liberal minded'..the people who would probably be more likely to advocate this behaviour.

I used them as an example and wasnt trying to dig out anyone on heres political leanings.

Following that I was just trying to build on the subject with a ficticious situation..

Ah, this is where it starts. Someone wonders something out loud and before you know it, the Daily Express has a new headline.

Read the whole thread and you'll see that no-one has said anything other than its a very bad idea.

I agree that no-one on the thread has endorsed doing it but the thread started with a group of four questions...

My answer was based on the original four questions..ok put in the form of an analogy

Sorry for the confusion.
 
Sponsored Links
I wasn't refering to a political party either, but the word 'liberal' and how some use it as a broad-spanning derogatory term.

In your example why not choose to say fascist parents who force their children to watch?
 
noodlz said:
I wasn't refering to a political party either, but the word 'liberal' and how some use it as a broad-spanning derogatory term.

I thought the term 'liberal' applied to people who thought a little bit harder about things?
 
Zampa said:
Hmm...no I wasnt refering to the political party I meant 'the liberal minded'..the people who would probably be more likely to advocate this behaviour.
Would they?

On what basis do you say that liberal minded people would probably be more likely to advocate this behaviour?

Do you consider yourself to be liberal minded?

Following that I was just trying to build on the subject with a ficticious situation..
To what end?

The OP asked at what age (of the child) should people start to worry if the child saw them having sex. How does creating a fictitious situation involving a presumed policy of a loosely defined group of people who you then attack because they ascribe to your presumed policy advance the discussion?

My answer was based on the original four questions..ok put in the form of an analogy
Please look that word up in a dictionary and learn what it means.
 
noodlz said:
I wasn't refering to a political party either, but the word 'liberal' and how some use it as a broad-spanning derogatory term.

In your example why not choose to say fascist parents who force their children to watch?

Yep, fair enough point for me..I used the term too losely..

Hands held up.

Down to my limited inner dictionary.

BAS:-

When, if ever, or up to what age, is it OK to have sex in front of your own children?

That doesnt imply that the kids just wandered in on a sunday morning and caught the couple 'at it'...It, and the following paragraph to me, is questioning whether there is an age limit as to when your kids should not see you doing it...and I wasnt the only one to pick up on that route.

So, without the analogy or any confusion of words on here, to put it plainly (ok a first from me!)

I dont think kids should see their parent/s havin sex at any time.

Hope thats a bit clearer all round
 
Zampa,

I think that people (myself included) maybe went a bit defensive because this is exactly how many of the 'Loony Left, PC Gone Mad' stories start to go out when people misinterpret the intention of people who brainstorm, for want of a better word.

For example, once upon a time, someone may have said 'I wonder if Brainstorming is an appropriate word, or will it cause offence to the mentally handicapped ?' purely because they think about the consequences of what they do. They probably came to the conclusion that it was all OK after a minute's thought, but that doesn't mean that you won't get someone coming along saying 'Loony Left PC Do-Gooders now say that we can't use the word Brainstorm'

Similarly, I could wonder out loud as to whether giving people who felt drawn to innapropriate porn on the internet a great big stack of, say, existing child porn so that they didn't feel the need to go out and do it themselves. Again, I may come to the conclusion in the very next breath that its not a good idea, but the story is still out there 'PC Nutters advocate free porn for Paedos' or somesuch.

This has happened so many times before. You're not really going to get chucked out of a school for saying Blackboard or wishing someone a Merry Christmas, but there's an awful lot of people out there who believe you will.

So, as you point out, no-one is actually saying that putting on a show for the kids is a good way of teaching them about sweet loving.....
 
johnny_t said:
...sweet loving.....

...down by the fire.

I did not mean to appear defensive or as if I was having a go, but I did want to clarify a point, because I'll bet my bottom dollar that in future on here when a debate about immigration or racism comes up, there will be those bandying about the term 'liberal' as if they'd just trod on something nasty. We shall see ;)

In Zampa's example it adds to the perception that someone who is liberal is not playing with a full deck, and I just wanted to redress the balance as Hermes and BAS do more eloquently.

I won't shoot down any brainstorming exercise, if I'm aware that's what it is and it is taken to its natural conclusion, but otherwise I'll mass debate with the rest of 'em.

Nothing personal Zampa. :D
 
You'll do what with the rest of them?? :eek: :eek: :eek:

































Oh - "mass debate" - sorry, I misread it...
 
noodlz said:
johnny_t said:
...sweet loving.....

...down by the fire.

I did not mean to appear defensive or as if I was having a go, but I did want to clarify a point, because I'll bet my bottom dollar that in future on here when a debate about immigration or racism comes up, there will be those bandying about the term 'liberal' as if they'd just trod on something nasty. We shall see ;)

In Zampa's example it adds to the perception that someone who is liberal is not playing with a full deck, and I just wanted to redress the balance as Hermes and BAS do more eloquently.

I won't shoot down any brainstorming exercise, if I'm aware that's what it is and it is taken to its natural conclusion, but otherwise I'll mass debate with the rest of 'em.

Nothing personal Zampa. :D

No offence taken and I do see your point entirely

Not in front of the local kids though......

:LOL: :LOL:

Not unless they are Liberals anyway :rolleyes:
 
btw
as a Good guy from the services, I sent this thread to a class 1 server ..an will be taken as click

I aint a grass but these threads ,

I cannot go into how they are leap frog links on normal boards to the open boards of paedos ...
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top