shoplifter defended by woke

[motorbiking]

Ok.

I’ll go with A - deliberately hard of thinking

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Ok.

I’ll go with A - deliberately hard of thinking

Really not sure why you can't say it is definitely not illegal if that is the case.

But..

Under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 it is also a criminal offence to mislead a consumer about their legal rights.

The following are examples of statements that are likely to mislead consumers about their rights:

• no refunds given
• goods can only be exchanged
• only credit notes will be given against faulty goods
• sold as seen

Even the statement 'No refunds except where goods are faulty' would be illegal, as there are a number of cases where a consumer can claim a refund on goods that are not faulty (such as misdescribed goods).

 

[johnny2007]

Are you being deliberately hard of thinking or genuinely confused? It would be unlawful subject to the provisions of the contract as extended by consumer protection legislation.

The retailer does not commit an illegal act by refusing the rights

Only 3 neurons working.
Don't be hard on himmy.

Ok.

I’ll go with A - deliberately hard of thinking

See above...

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Only 3 neurons working.
Don't be hard on himmy.

See above...

You may be fooled by slippery words Walt

 

[motorbiking]

I already covered deliberate practices.

We don’t know if the product was faulty or misdescribed or simply the wrong size/colour. We also don’t know if the woman even had proof of purchase. Etc etc.

There are some offences, but these are reserved for retailers who are effectively scammers who defraud consumers with criminal intent.

A retailer does not commit a criminal offence by refusing to refund a legitimate claim.

that is not what https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/contents/made. Is all about.

Give it a read

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I already covered deliberate practices.

A retailer does not commit a criminal offence by refusing to refund a legitimate claim.

that is not what https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/contents/made. Is all about.

Give it a read

I will stick with what I posted in 137

You can dispute that if you want. But it appears it MAY be illegal

 

[motorbiking]

Which is wrong. Refusing a legitimate claim is a civil matter. Trying to convince the consumer he does not have a right that he does, is entirely different.

Surely you can see the difference? If you stop pretending to be hard of thinking

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Which is wrong. Refusing a legitimate claim is a civil matter. Trying to convince the consumer he does not have a right that he does, is entirely different.

Surely you can see the difference? If you stop pretending to be hard of thinking

Not according to what I posted.


Under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 it is also a criminal offence to mislead a consumer about their legal rights.

Are you saying it is wrong ?

 

[JP_]

Absolute cobblers. It was Khans decision alone to expand the zone.

ULEZ: London Mayor Sadiq Khan has power to widen scheme, High Court told

London's mayor is facing a legal challenge over controversial plans to expand a low-emission zone.

www.bbc.co.uk

Leaked letter shows Govt urged Khan to expand ULEZ

Grant Shapps has urged Keir Starmer to "get off the fence" and tell Khan to stop the ULEZ expansion. That's not what he was saying in 2020.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

 

[Odds]

A shopkeeper has said he regrets seizing a woman by the throat after a huge protest erupted over footage of the incident.

On whether he would act the same way if he could go back in time, he said: "No I wouldn't behave the same. I just wanted to keep her inside. It wasn't intentional." And addressing how he would react if he saw the same happen to his wife or daughter, he continued: "I would react the same way that people are reacting.

They were filmed chanting “shut it down” as anger at the video continues to grow. A second protest is planned outside the shop on Saturday.

regrets? he has a few@the Mirror.co.uk

 

[Mottie]

Leaked letter shows Govt urged Khan to expand ULEZ

Grant Shapps has urged Keir Starmer to "get off the fence" and tell Khan to stop the ULEZ expansion. That's not what he was saying in 2020.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

Do you read your own links?
I’ll type s l o w l y so you can understand and put relevant words in bold.
There was the original ULEZ in central London that charged CONGESTION charge and ULEZ
The ULEZ was expanded to the north and south circular roads in 2021
Your article said the government wanted to also expand congestion charging in that 2021 ULEZ expansion zone.
The current expansion is f'ck all to do with either of those
The current expansion to all London borough's was solely Khans decision. He has said it enough times. Are you that blind and deaf that you’ve missed those proud boasts of the midget Khunt?

 

[Mottie]

A shopkeeper has said he regrets seizing a woman by the throat after a huge protest erupted over footage of the incident.

On whether he would act the same way if he could go back in time, he said: "No I wouldn't behave the same. I just wanted to keep her inside. It wasn't intentional." And addressing how he would react if he saw the same happen to his wife or daughter, he continued: "I would react the same way that people are reacting.

They were filmed chanting “shut it down” as anger at the video continues to grow. A second protest is planned outside the shop on Saturday.

regrets? he has a few@the Mirror.co.uk

They should all be told to keep their hair on.

 

[Brigadier]

A shopkeeper has said he regrets seizing a woman by the throat after a huge protest erupted over footage of the incident.

On whether he would act the same way if he could go back in time, he said: "No I wouldn't behave the same. I just wanted to keep her inside. It wasn't intentional." And addressing how he would react if he saw the same happen to his wife or daughter, he continued: "I would react the same way that people are reacting.

They were filmed chanting “shut it down” as anger at the video continues to grow. A second protest is planned outside the shop on Saturday.

regrets? he has a few@the Mirror.co.uk

Closing down?


Things are going to get ugly around there...........

 

[johnny2007]

Which is wrong. Refusing a legitimate claim is a civil matter. Trying to convince the consumer he does not have a right that he does, is entirely different.

Surely you can see the difference? If you stop pretending to be hard of thinking

Come on mate.
You're trying to explain the difference between criminal and civil matters to Himmy.
Seriously, give up.

 

[Mottie]

I wouldn’t like to be the owner of the nearest trainer shop to that store in the next few days. Black Nikes matter.