I'm sure he can answer for himself.
Vinty has been hopping from one foot to the other.Vinty said is Ireland within the British Isles true or false he didn't say it was part of Great Britain.
The he claimed that Ireland was originally British, which is total nonsense.N.Ireland wasn't 'created' , the 6 counties were in the UK before partition and remained in the UK after partition.
It was the Irish free state that was created to please Irish nationalists.
You should have paid more attention at school and might have learned something.
Who are these immigrants you refer to in your post.
Then he admitted to making his own version of history.Ireland was originally British, it is in the British Isles.
The earliest maps of the British Isles show clearly that Ireland was inhabited by British speaking people, the place and river names were P Celtic or pre Celtic.
Stop harping on about the past and accept the world has changed.
All this crap about 'Native Irish' is nonsense, there are no more native Irish than there are native Anglo Saxons or native Welsh.
Ulster has always been British in one form or another, nothing will ever change that.
History is a craft, not a science.
Everyone has the right to craft their version of their own history.
But not necessarily truthfully or sensibly.I'm sure he can answer for himself.
Sure, you can nake up your own version of history, even if it is fantasy.He was very much on the mark how history is crafted.
So many examples of that happening in the hands of the wokists modern day.
And conversely you can base it in reality.Sure, you can nake up your own version of history, even if it is fantasy.
Ok.And conversely you can base it in reality.
I've no skin in the debate, all I did was point out what seemed the bleeding obvious.Ok.
Tell us how you see the history of Ireland
The wokist anti slavery mob that you are so against?So many examples of that happening in the hands of the wokists modern day.
Not necessarily on a given topic you seem to be eager to debate.The wokist anti slavery mob that you are so against?
Then it's not your version.And conversely you can base it in reality.
Or the same could be said of you given your ability to spin the written word.Then it's not your version.
Post 124 is no skin in the debate?I've no skin in the debate, all I did was point out what seemed the bleeding obvious.
I thought wokism might not be considered a tenuous link, well done for making it so. Now that is a play on the written word.Post 124 is no skin in the debate?
Ok, now you ARE confused.