What happens when potential members of the EU decide they don't want to accept the EU offer of membership.
The EU made Ukraine an offer it couldn't refuse and when it refused?
https://www.briefingsforbritain.co.uk/eu-arrogance-with-russia-and-northern-ireland/
A Prof spouting rubbish and missing a number of points.
One thing is completely missing. Prior to 1991 the EU had a boarder with "Russia". Closeness meant that there was far more trading between them than say Russia with the USA. After the collapse which is more like the UK ditching it's empire really trading has continued.
Russia even started a common wealth. Some satellite states did better than others. Ukraine was expected to do well but didn't. Corruption probably figures. A problem they still seem to have. They used the IMF and had problems. Documented go read it. IMF loans come with conditions.
Along comes 2014 and right wing nationalists manage to stir up riots and take over government buildings all over the place. Failing in some areas. They have been fanning the population ever since. The end result has similar features to NI.
Or so we are told anyway. What probably kicked it off. Money and loans. Russia's terms would be entirely different to the IMF. Where will their imports have come from - mostly Russia. Where do spares come from - Russia. Neither money options really get around all structural problems.
So your an ailing country why join the EU. It's pretty simple really you pay in X% of GDP and get money back that can be spent in certain areas. The return can be greater than what is put in.
It's called levelling up. The country also gets what was called the common market. They can also have a new currency which is likely to be more stable than their own in some cases due to the shear number of people who use it. Some countries may turn into a Greece over time. They will be expected and even forced to fix it. They may get EU aid to help.Bit like the IMF.
Why let countries in. Bigger market when and if they develop. People can figure too. All nations have jobs that nationals don't want. People from higher unemployment areas tend to fill them. The UK's current answer to that is to make unemployment as unattractive as possible even to the extent of expecting charities to help. Businesses can also feel that no local people can do a job. Rather than train import some that can. It's cheaper.
The problem with levelling up is jobs. Pay ranges and numbers of jobs at these pay levels need to even up as well. Tricky to say the least. In the EU one aspect is that the people who live in some area must earn enough to buy stuff. Some may start producing their own stuff eventually. Even better. The tariffs are intended to help with that.