...........of PutinThe reason they came to Belarus in the first place was because
...........of PutinThe reason they came to Belarus in the first place was because
EU sanctions against Belarus have damaged its economy
As to your explanation of how and why they arrived in Belarus, you're way wide of the mark as usual. The migrants were lured to Belarus with false promises of entry into EU.
Stick to the truth, its easier to remember.During a visit to the Belarus-Poland border on Friday, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko told migrants that his government could help them return to their home countries. But FRANCE 24’s Gulliver Cragg, reporting from a border camp in Belarus, said few were enticed by the offer.
“Everyone we spoke to said they do not plan to take advantage of the free flights being offered back to Iraq. They’re still determined to try to make it into the European Union,” says FRANCE 24’s Gulliver Cragg, reporting from Bruzgi
Indeed, and UK also has sanctions in place against Belarus.conflation
Belarus is an aggressor and a shill for Putin -there was little option but to impose sanctions, which have been approved by Estonia, France, Ireland, Norway, the United States and Britain, which said: "We will remain united and determined to protect the EU against these hybrid operations by Belarusian authorities."
Offensive.pretending to be brain-damaged
You wouldn't recognise the truth if it jumped up and bit your backside.Stick to the truth, its easier to remember.
In my previous post on Sunday 28th November, my comment was as reported at the time.In your previous posts you claimed that these migrants were being forced onto the Belarus/Poland border by the Belarus government.
You are now Quoting an EU source confirming that these migrants are not being prevented from returning to their home countries and are at the Belarus border voluntarily.
I suspect that transam is damaged, but it's more to do with his ideology than any brain damage.Transam is well-known for pretending to be brain-damaged and inserting spelling and grammatical "errors"
He finds it entertaining.
Read my post again.thats bolox
Iraq -was invaded by America
Syria -war on its own people by Assam and proxy by Russia, Iran etc
Yemen - proxy war by Saudi Arabia
Eritrea -nothing to do with UK
Iran -nothing to do with Blair
I apologise, sometimes i don't read your posts in their entirety.You wouldn't recognise the truth if it jumped up and bit your backside.
In my previous post on Sunday 28th November, my comment was as reported at the time.
It's now Wednesday 1st December, in case you hadn't noticed, and the world moves on.
It still proves you're living in some parallel universe, where the truth is according to Vinty and no-one else.
It was nonsense both times.Read my post again.
Then you made some daft assumptions.I said, Tony Blair and co..
Iraq - Invaded by US/UK.
You don't think the Arab Spring had anything to do with it.Syria- war was direct result of US/UK invasion of Iraq.
Why would US/UK want to go to war with Yemen?Yemen - proxy war initiated US/UK.
Saudia Arabia is the proxy in this case.
That's about the nearest you've got to a possible valid argument.Eritrea - war, direct result of the spread of Islamic fundamentalism caused by US/UK wars in the middle east.
Then by your own admission, you base your awareness of what's happening in the world on brief snatches of the news, brief headlines, etc., or more likely brief comments by people like the DUP, and you fail to investigate their veracity.I apologise, sometimes i don't read your posts in their entirety.
Life is too short for that.
You could try giving the abridged versions of your thoughts.
Although i must confess, even they would stress test my attention span.
all of which would have happened with or without Blair -he made no material difference.Read my post again.
I said, Tony Blair and co..
Iraq - Invaded by US/UK.
Syria- war was direct result of US/UK invasion of Iraq.
Yemen - proxy war initiated US/UK.
Saudia Arabia is the proxy in this case.
Eritrea - war, direct result of the spread of Islamic fundamentalism caused by US/UK wars in the middle east.
No, just your posts.base your awareness of what's happening in the world on brief snatches of the news
I apologise, sometimes i don't read your posts in their entirety.
Life is too short for that.
You could try giving the abridged versions of your thoughts.
Although i must confess, even they would stress test my attention span.
Then by your own admission, you base your awareness of what's happening in the world on
You base your opinion on what's happening in the world, just on my posts, but by your own admission, you don't read all of it?just your posts.