This newcastle

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Oooo.... Touchy! Your best argument is to correct a typo. I was referring to the tax threashold in the UK.... Have I hit a nerve?

The difference between Caymen isles and Cayman Islands was a typo?
It is a good job you still have the stabilisers on your bike, the way you are backpedalling. Otherwise you would fall flat on your face.
Oh, you have already!

Typical plumber.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

.... any design loo.... Even the old MOD style latrines.

Demonstrating and confirming your real experience.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

.. , you would have to talk to his missis

She does not talk to low-life.
Certainly not habitual liars.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

I have never been a plumber... What makes you think that I am?

.... any design loo.... Even the old MOD style latrines.

Hmmm. Your vast experience with loos, perhaps.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

.... I think that you have a corgigrouch fetish.

So if someone mentions something more than twice, or three times, it is a fetish.

I will just go and look how many times you refer to inflatables....... back in a minute.

 

[Corgigrouch GTi]

Hmmm. Your vast experience with loos, perhaps.

Yep, I use a loo several times a day... I feel that it would help you if you did too.

 

[Corgigrouch GTi]

She does not talk to low-life.
Certainly not habitual liars.

But if you press the button behind her ear then she will make realistic "Oooh, Ahhh" noises

 

[Judy in the sky]

She does not talk to low-life.

Not since you caught her speaking to a Yorkshire terrier ehh

Just to add to the debate, I see the MP for Bradford West, Naz Shah, has been castigated for tweeting that the girls in the Rotherham abuse scandal, should have kept their mouths shut... Typical of a Muslim woman, Not a word of sympathy for the victims, but support for the perpetrators. A disgrace.

 

[JohnD]

I see

Glad to hear it. I wouldn't like to think you were spreading selective gossip. For some reason she retweeted from a scam spoof site, then removed it.

As the Bun says in small print:

"A spokesman for Ms Shah said: "This was a genuine accident eight days ago that was rectified within minutes. To suggest otherwise is absolute nonsense.

“Her record speaks for itself. Naz has been working for over 20 years on the issues of child abuse, violence against women and grooming, which is well documented."

Strangely, they include that at the bottom of the page, after through and repeated smears and criticism. Is the Bun anti-Labour?

 

[Brigadier]

Glad to hear it. I wouldn't like to think you were spreading selective gossip. For some reason she retweeted from a scam spoof site, then removed it.

As the Bun says in small print:

"A spokesman for Ms Shah said: "This was a genuine accident eight days ago that was rectified within minutes. To suggest otherwise is absolute nonsense.

“Her record speaks for itself. Naz has been working for over 20 years on the issues of child abuse, violence against women and grooming, which is well documented."

Strangely, they include that at the bottom of the page, after through and repeated smears and criticism. Is the Bun anti-Labour?

And I wouldn't like to think that you were spreading selective gossip. Article here.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/42991...ictims-to-be-quiet-for-the-good-of-diversity/

"Thorough and repeated smears and criticism."

'SHUT YOUR MOUTH'
Corbyn ally shares message telling Rotherham sex abuse victims to be quiet ‘for the good of diversity’

Fact. Admitted.

Naz Shah claims she accidentally liked and shared message from parody Twitter account.

Shah's spokesperson's own statement.

A PROMINENT Labour MP and key ally of Jeremy Corbyn shared a social media message telling victims of sickening sex abuse to shut up for "the good of diversity."

Fact.

Naz Shah retweeted and liked a post on Twitter by an account parodying left-wing writer Owen Jones which said: "Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity."

Fact.

Her actions have reignited the furious row over Pakistani sex gangs which last week saw Labour MP Sarah Champion hounded out of Labour's front benches for writing an article in The Sun addressing the issue.

Dunno, but is it not good to keep shining the light on child abuse?

Ms Shah, who later deleted the retweet and unliked the post, was a key figure in leading the furore against a column written by The Sun's Trevor Kavanagh about the grooming sex scandal last week.

Might be fact, but not much of a smear?

Equality and Human Rights Commission chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath immediately condemned the Labour MP last night.

She said: “Ms Shah should know better.

“We need to keep the victims of these horrific crimes at the heart of the debate and always remember that diversity is not served by silence.”

Fact?

The British-born Muslim MP, 43, who was once a key aide to Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, accused Mr Kavanagh of using "Nazi-like terminology".

She organised an open letter to The Sun signed by 107 MPs demanding action.

Ms Shah, who served on the influential House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, wrote The Sun’s piece was “irresponsible” and that it set “a dangerous precedent.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn praised her for the letter on his Facebook page.


Hardly smearing.


Last year the Bradford West MP was suspended by Labour for anti-semitic online posts.

In one, she shared rants on Facebook calling for Israel to be uprooted and dumped in America. In another she likened Israeli policies to those of Hitler and also wrote: “The Jews are rallying.”

She later blamed her anti-semitism on “ignorance”.


Looks like fact; could be easily-verified.


A total of 20 girls gave evidence during the trials at Newcastle crown court, which saw 17 men and one woman jailed for grooming.


Fact.


A spokesman for Ms Shah said: "This was a genuine accident eight days ago that was rectified within minutes. To suggest otherwise is absolute nonsense.


Reported as fact.

The spokesman would hardly claim it was anything other than an accident though, would he? Unless Ms Shah fancied political suicide, and a zero-hours job at best.....


“Her record speaks for itself. Naz has been working for over 20 years on the issues of child abuse, violence against women and grooming, which is well documented."

I'll take that as fact, paints her in a good light.


Is JohnD anti-Sun?

 

[Judy in the sky]

Glad to hear it. I wouldn't like to think you were spreading selective gossip. For some reason she retweeted from a scam spoof site, then removed it.

As the Bun says in small print:

"A spokesman for Ms Shah said: "This was a genuine accident eight days ago that was rectified within minutes. To suggest otherwise is absolute nonsense.

“Her record speaks for itself. Naz has been working for over 20 years on the issues of child abuse, violence against women and grooming, which is well documented."

You think she's that stupid that it was a "genuine accident" ? These were her own bloody words Johnnyboy
I don't believe for one moment that it was an accident at all. She's obviously put her own feelings into words in this instance. At least we know where her sympathies lie,, and that isn't with the victims of Rotherham.
I now wonder what else she'd like us to keep quiet about ?,, all in the interests of diversity. She's still a bloody disgrace and should be removed from office immediately.

 

[Brigadier]

Just spoken with a colleague who uses Twitter.

I asked her if she thought you could "like" and "retweet" a tweet, by accident.

Unlikely, was her opinion; three separate inputs, in different screen areas. In a specific order.

Not using Tw@tter myself, I couldn't support or refute that opinion.

 

[JohnD]

Is JohnD anti-Sun?

Certainly.

I am not alone.

poor old Judy is writing nonsense again.

 

[Brigadier]

Certainly.

I am not alone.

Not much up with the story though.

 

[Doggit]

My reasoning was concluded from the fact Firegrouchcorgi rarely tells the truth

Now step back a minute Noesall, and look at this dispasionately. Apart from Ian H, none of us post pictures, none of us know what the other does, and none of us can prove who's lying, and who's not - apart from Wannabe, who admitted he was Himmagin, and now denies it.

Everything else is speculation, and you may think that Firebrand was originally Corgigrouch, but you can't prove it, so you can't really call him a liar - even if he is.