Yeah, might be something like this?.

 
Sponsored Links
Did a few sums on the above and assuming the buffer is fully recharged after each burner run then the times might look like something below,
and because you still have the 21L boiler HEX "buffer" then I did the calcs based on installing a 25L external buffer which gives a total buffering effect of 46L (21+25).
36 kw burner. all times in minutes
Heating Demand 3kw no ext. buffer ONtime./OFFtime/Cycletime 0.89/9.77/10.66 With ext.buffer ONtime/Offtime/Cycletime 1.46/16.05/17.51
Heating Demand 12kw no ext. buffer ONtime./OFFtime/Cycletime 1.22/2.44/3.66 With ext.buffer ONtime/Offtime/Cycletime 2.01/4.01/6.02
Heating Demand 30kw no ext. buffer ONtime./OFFtime/Cycletime 4.88/0.98/5.86 With ext.buffer ONtime/Offtime/Cycletime 8.02/1.60/9.63

In all cases above it extends all the times by a factor of X1.64.
 
Is it a fair assumption that with or without a 25L buffer the percentage of time the boiler is firing during each cycle time for whatever heating demand remains the same?
The only way to reduce fuel consumption is downsizing nozzle?
 
Sponsored Links
No, not really, the only way to reduce fuel consumption is to reduce your heat demand, you might save 3or 4% with reduced cycling but that's it.
 
Re fuel consumption - that's actually good news because I do think my main worry was short cycling drinking the fuel but only a potential 3-4% efficiency reassures me that the home heating oil isn't being used in excessive quantities. The plumes of condensing steam being emitted every few minutes I can cope with as no neighbours apart from a few cows!
 
If the ACV cylinder installed is the plus model you should be able to utilise additional ports for buffer storage on return feed. Just need a decent heating engineer that will understand pipe work configuration.
 
Unfortunately it isn't the Plus model - there's no additionally ports on the side of cylinder as ACV website pics show. There's one unused port on the top of the cylinder but no idea what it is for!
 
It seems a bit over engineered for domestic purposes, doubles the total system primary water volume, requires a giant of a pump to achieve a circ rate of its max required of 91.7LPM, admittedly only from cold requires 300L heating to give 200L DHW, ok it has 2.29M2 heating surface v/vs ~ 1.0M2 of a coil but then apparently requires 68kw to achieve a reheat time of 22 minutes.
Your numbers show a heating dT of < 1.0C at 53LPM so only extracting 3 to 4kw, fouling??.
 
I know or - the commissioning certificate shows cleaner was put into system but he never came back to flush it out. Perhaps there's sludge so will ask engineer next week to check!
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top